whatmodel.sh / stt / wav2vec 2.0 Large 960h LV-60 self-training
wav2vec 2.0 Large 960h LV-60 self-training
↗ share
+ contribute
wav2vec 2.0 Large 960h LV-60 self-training is an open-weights speech-to-text model from Meta, released October 2020. Its published size is 0.32B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Exact checkpoint facebook/wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self (CTC fine-tuned on LibriSpeech 960h). Params: fp32 pytorch_model.bin 1,262,055,246 bytes / 4; released: arXiv 2010.11430v1 month (self-training paper).
Score within the Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The speech-to-text models ranked either side of wav2vec 2.0 Large 960h LV-60 self-training, out of 176 with a score, then more from Meta.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | 25±3 | local | |||
| 163 | 25±3 | local | |||
| 164 | 16±3 | local | |||
| 165 | 16±4 | local | |||
| 166 | 15±4 | local | |||
| more from Meta | |||||
| 1 | 71±3 | api $0.0030/audio min | |||
| 58 | 58±2 | local | |||
| 59 | 58±3 | local | |||
see all speech-to-text models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
other tests5 not in a task · 96% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) | 21.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃··▁▁▂██▆ beats 11/86 | 39% |
| LibriSpeech test-other WER lab | 3.9% ✎ | ▂·▂·▂······█ beats 5/6 | 34% |
| LibriSpeech test-clean WER +1 | 1.8% ✎ | ▂··▂·▃▂█▂▃▃▃ beats 15/16 | 14% |
| AfriSpeech-200 test (108 African accents) · WER | 61.1% ✎ | ███····█████ beats 2/7 | 6.2% |
| TED-LIUM test WER (short-form) | 13.5% ✎ | ▂····▂▂▂█▃▃▂ beats 8/13 | 2.8% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~2.04 GB · from huggingface.co/facebook
uv run --with transformers --with torch python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('automatic-speech-recognition', model='facebook/wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self', chunk_length_s=30)('audio.wav')['text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/facebook ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Meta (facebook org) Hugging F… 46%, Open ASR Leaderboard 39%, AfriSpeech-200 (arXiv:2310.00… 6% and 1 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 46% | |
| 1 | 39% | |
| 1 | 6% | |
| 2 | 5% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 4% | |
| weighted average | = 15.8 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json