whatmodel.sh / stt / HuBERT X-Large (LibriSpeech 960h ft)
HuBERT X-Large (LibriSpeech 960h ft)
↗ share
+ contribute
HuBERT X-Large (LibriSpeech 960h ft) is an open-weights speech-to-text model from Meta, released June 2021. Its published size is 0.96B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Exact checkpoint facebook/hubert-xlarge-ls960-ft (CTC fine-tuned on LibriSpeech 960h). Params: HF safetensors total; released: arXiv 2106.07447v1 month.
Score within the Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The speech-to-text models ranked either side of HuBERT X-Large (LibriSpeech 960h ft), out of 176 with a score, then more from Meta.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163 | 25±3 | local | |||
| 164 | 16±3 | local | |||
| 165 | 16±4 | local | |||
| 166 | 15±4 | local | |||
| 167 | 15±5 | local | |||
| more from Meta | |||||
| 1 | 71±3 | api $0.0030/audio min | |||
| 58 | 58±2 | local | |||
| 59 | 58±3 | local | |||
see all speech-to-text models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
other tests4 not in a task · 93% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) | 22.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃··▁▁▂██▆ beats 9/86 | 58% |
| LibriSpeech test-clean WER +1 | 2.1% ✎ | ▂··▂·▃▂█▂▃▃▃ beats 13/16 | 21% |
| AfriSpeech-200 test (108 African accents) · WER | 64.1% ✎ | ███····█████ beats 1/7 | 9.3% |
| TED-LIUM test WER (short-form) | 14.7% ✎ | ▂····▂▂▂█▃▃▂ beats 4/13 | 4.2% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~5.11 GB · from huggingface.co/facebook
uv run --with transformers --with torch python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('automatic-speech-recognition', model='facebook/hubert-xlarge-ls960-ft', chunk_length_s=30)('audio.wav')['text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/facebook ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Open ASR Leaderboard 58%, Meta (facebook org) Hugging F… 18%, AfriSpeech-200 (arXiv:2310.00… 9% and 1 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58% | |
| 1 | 18% | |
| 1 | 9% | |
| 2 | 8% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 7% | |
| weighted average | = 15.7 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json