whatmodel.sh / video / Step-Video-T2V

Step-Video-T2V is an open-weights video model from StepFun, released February 2025. Its published size is 30B parameters. Licence: mit.

Catalogue identity notes

StepFun Step-Video-T2V (stepfun-ai/stepvideo-t2v, pinned 7a2b639). VideoArgus cites 'Step-Video [27, 14]' (the Step-Video-T2V and Step-Video-TI2V reports) with #P 29B; its T2V leaderboard row is mapped to the Step-Video-T2V checkpoint, the only StepFun model for that input mode (the -Turbo T2V distillation is a separate repo and is not assumed). Comparison-only: local route not verified (multi-GPU).

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗ · Parameter count ↗

30B as stated by StepFun ('a state-of-the-art text-to-video pre-trained model with 30 billion parameters'); VideoArgus prints 29B.

44.7±6.6comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The video models ranked either side of Step-Video-T2V, out of 139 with a score, then more from StepFun.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
87Hailuo 01 (MiniMax video-01 / I2V-01) MiniMax46±4api $0.083/sec2024-08
88Kling 1.6 (Standard mode) Kuaishou (Kling AI)45±5comparison only2024-12
89Step-Video-T2V StepFun45±7comparison only2025-02
90HunyuanVideo-I2V Tencent45±4local~57GB2025-03
91CogVideoX-5B Zhipu AI (THUDM)44±2api price unknown +local~13GB2024-08
more from StepFun
92Step-Video-TI2V StepFun44±7comparison only2025-03

see all video models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

other tests1 not in a task · 81% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
VideoArgus-Bench T2V (rubric-grounded score)77.7% ✎█▄·▄█▄▄····▄ beats 2/8easy · avg 82%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 81%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/stepfun-ai ↗

$ how the score was worked out · VideoArgus: Agentic Rubric-Gr… 81%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
VideoArgus: Agentic Rubric-Grounded Unified Evaluation for Video Generation and Editing (arXiv:2608.05485v1)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 81%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇▇▇▇ 19%
weighted average= 44.7

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json