whatmodel.sh / Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is a closed-weights language model from StepFun. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Exact Arena entry 'Step 5 Preview' in the October 2026 pinned dataset. Comparison identity; no public run route inferred from leaderboard inclusion.

75.0±1.4comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 4 benchmark results across 1 source

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Step 5 Preview, out of 828 with a score, then more from StepFun.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
43Muse Spark 1.1 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-07
44Muse Spark Meta75±2comparison only2026-04
45Step 5 Preview StepFun75±1comparison only
46Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic75±1api $4.00/M2026-06
47Grok 4.7 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-09
more from StepFun
115Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) StepFun68±1api $0.15/M +local~118GB2026-02
132Step 3.7 Flash (198B-A11B) StepFun67±1api $0.44/M +local~104GB2026-05

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #39 of 340 * · 36% of its score · 1 test

Beats Gemini 3.7 Flash, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GLM-5.3-Flash, Grok 4.7, Claude Sonnet 5 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggregate IPS)0.0048 IPS ✎▁▁▁▄▂▃▇█▂▂▁▃ beats 21/49avg -0.312 IPS▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 36%sharp
coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #34 of 524 * · 32% of its score · 1 test

Beats GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Terra, Claude Opus 4.8 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3.8 27B, GLM-5.2, GLM-5.3-Flash here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1570.2 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 88/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 32%sharp
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #56 of 463 * · 18% of its score · 1 test

Beats MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B), GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Luna here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1453.7 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 319/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▄▇▇█▃ #43 of 182 * · 12% of its score · 1 test

Beats MiMo-V2.6-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B), DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3.6 Flash, Qwen3.6 Plus, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1259.7 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 108/145avg 1068▇▇▇▇▇ 12%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 99%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset4▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 99%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 75.0

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json