whatmodel.sh / video / Seedance 1.0 Pro

Seedance 1.0 Pro

+ contribute
Update model informationAdd a place to run itAdd a test resultPropose a benchmarkCorrect a benchmark scoreEdit data on GitHub

Seedance 1.0 Pro is a closed-weights video model from ByteDance Seed, released June 2025.

Model information sources

Release date ↗

55.7±1.9#35 of 93 video modelsfrom 3 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The video models ranked either side of Seedance 1.0 Pro, out of 139 with a score, then more from ByteDance Seed.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
41Runway Aleph Runway56±5comparison only2025-07
42Wan 2.2 I2V A14B Alibaba56±2api $0.080/sec +local~31GB2025-07
43Seedance 1.0 Pro ByteDance Seed56±2api $0.052/sec2025-06
44Kling O1 Pro Kuaishou (Kling AI)56±2api $0.11/sec
45Wan 2.6 Flash Alibaba55±7api $0.025/sec2026-01
more from ByteDance Seed
5Dreamina Seedance 2.0 ByteDance Seed79±1api $0.30/sec2026-03
39Seedance 1.5 Pro ByteDance Seed58±2api $0.052/sec2025-12
65Seaweed-7B ByteDance Seed50±6comparison only2025-04

see all video models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to video▆▄▃▄▆▅█▃▂▂▂▄ #26 of 68 * · 59% of its score · 1 test

Trails Hailuo 2.3, P-Video, Kling O1 Pro here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena video1190.9 ✎▂▂▃▆█▆·▆▅▁▂▇ beats 13/41avg 1147▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 59%typical
image to video▁▂·▂▅█▅▄▅▆▃▄ #28 of 50 * · 39% of its score · 1 test

Beats Seedance 1.5 Pro, Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro, Wan 2.2 I2V A14B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Cosmos3-Nano here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena image-to-video1273.0 ✎▁▁▁▁▄▇▃▆▃▂▄█ beats 16/40avg 1189▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 39%typical
other tests1 not in a task · 1.0% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ViGoR-Bench zero-shot visual reasoning, video generators (Result Avg)29.6% ✎█··█·······█ beats 2/2hard · avg 16%▇ 1.0%blunt · noisy · small run

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · BytePlus ModelArk · $0.052/sec · docs.byteplus.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per second of 720p video, derived from BytePlus's own price example for Seedance 1.0 Pro: a 720p 16:9 (1248×704) 24 fps 5-second video (102,960 tokens) costs $0.26 (÷ 5 = $0.052). Product: BytePlus ModelArk video generation (online inference). API model: seedance-1-0-pro-250528. Settings: resolution=720p, ratio=16:9, duration=5 s, no input video. Price basis: provider-printed per-video example; underlying billing is $2.5 per 1M video tokens (offline inference $1.25), and BytePlus labels the examples as estimates (actual tokens per usage.completion_tokens). Other examples: 10-s 720p 16:9 $0.51; 5-s 480p $0.12; 5-s 1080p $0.61. Only successfully generated videos are billed. Currency: USD. BytePlus official pricing page, observed 2026-09-26.

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 98%, ViGoR-Bench: How Far Are Visu… 1%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 98%CC BY 4.0
ViGoR-Bench: How Far Are Visual Generative Models From Zero-Shot Visual Reasoners? (arXiv:2603.25823v1)1▇ 1%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 55.7

$ improve this page

Update model informationAdd a place to run itAdd a test resultPropose a benchmarkCorrect a benchmark scoreEdit data on GitHub

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json