whatmodel.sh / video / Runway Gen-4.5
Runway Gen-4.5
↗ share
+ contribute
Runway Gen-4.5 is a closed-weights video model from Runway, released December 2025. Licence: proprietary.
$ how it compares
The video models ranked either side of Runway Gen-4.5, out of 139 with a score, then more from Runway.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | 59±2 | api $0.070/sec | |||
| 35 | 59±2 | api $0.045/sec | |||
| 36 | 58±2 | api $0.12/sec | |||
| 37 | 58±5 | api price unknown | |||
| 38 | 58±4 | local | |||
| more from Runway | |||||
| 26 | 65±7 | api $0.28/sec | |||
| 41 | 56±5 | comparison only | |||
| 68 | 50±4 | comparison only | |||
$ what it's good at
text to video▆▄▃▄▆▅█▃▂▂▂▄ #19 of 68 * · 81% of its score · 1 test
Beats Kling 2.6 Pro here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Seedance 1.5 Pro here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena video | 1224.7 ✎ | ▂▂▃▆█▆·▆▅▁▂▇ beats 20/41 | 81% |
image to video▁▂·▂▅█▅▄▅▆▃▄ #18 of 50 * · 8.9% of its score · 1 test
Beats HappyHorse 1.1, Vidu Q3 Pro, Wan 2.6 here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| VGI-Bench visual reasoning (I2V) | 36.6% ✎ | ▄▄···▄▄█·█·▄ beats 4/8 | 8.9% |
other tests1 not in a task · 8.5% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWITCH interactive-interface I2V (VLM-judge overall) | 36.0% ✎ | ███··█·····█ beats 1/4 | 8.5% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · $0.12/sec · docs.dev.runwayml.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per generated second, standard Gen-4.5 output. 12 credits × USD0.01/credit; professional/HDR format surcharges and sales tax excluded. Product: Runway developer API. API model: gen4.5. Settings: output format=standard, prores=no, hdr=no. Price basis: published rate. Currency: USD.
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 81%, VGI-Bench: Probing Visual Int… 9%, SWITCH: Benchmarking Modeling… 8%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81% | |
| 1 | 9% | |
| 1 | 8% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 58.4 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json