whatmodel.sh / video / Kling 2.6 Pro
Kling 2.6 Pro
↗ share
+ contribute
Kling 2.6 Pro is a closed-weights video model from Kuaishou (Kling AI), released December 2025. Licence: proprietary.
$ how it compares
The video models ranked either side of Kling 2.6 Pro, out of 139 with a score, then more from Kuaishou (Kling AI).
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 62±11 | api $0.049/sec | |||
| 33 | 61±2 | api $0.10/sec | |||
| 34 | 59±2 | api $0.070/sec | |||
| 35 | 59±2 | api $0.045/sec | |||
| 36 | 58±2 | api $0.12/sec | |||
| more from Kuaishou (Kling AI) | |||||
| 22 | 68±4 | api $0.084/sec | |||
| 31 | 64±4 | api $0.11/sec | |||
| 44 | 56±2 | api $0.11/sec | |||
$ what it's good at
text to video▆▄▃▄▆▅█▃▂▂▂▄ #21 of 68 * · 52% of its score · 2 tests
Trails Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro, Seedance 1.5 Pro, Runway Gen-4.5 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena video | 1216.2 ✎ | ▂▂▃▆█▆·▆▅▁▂▇ beats 18/41 | 45% |
| WorldJen human preference (Bradley-Terry) | 1572.0 ✎ | █···██·█··██ beats 4/5 | 6.5% |
image to video▁▂·▂▅█▅▄▅▆▃▄ #20 of 50 * · 47% of its score · 2 tests
Beats HappyHorse 1.1, Vidu Q3 Pro, Wan 2.5 Preview here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Runway Gen-4.5 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena image-to-video | 1294.0 ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▄▇▃▆▃▂▄█ beats 18/40 | 30% |
| Rapidata physics realism (I2V, with reference) | 1034.0 ✎ | ▂··▂▂▆█▆▂▂▆▄ beats 6/19 | 17% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · fal.ai · $0.070/sec · fal.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD per second of generated video on fal.ai, audio off. Product: fal Kling 2.6 Pro text-to-video endpoint. API model: fal-ai/kling-video/v2.6/pro/text-to-video. Settings: generate_audio=false (the endpoint default is true, which costs $0.14/s). Price basis: per-second rate printed by fal. Not the Kling direct tariff. Currency: USD. fal.ai model page, observed 2026-09-25.
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 75%, Rapidata/world-model-physics… 17%, WorldJen: An End-to-End Multi… 7%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 75% | |
| 1 | 17% | |
| 1 | 7% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 59.3 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json