whatmodel.sh / Reka Flash (2024-09-04)

Reka Flash (2024-09-04) is a closed-weights language model from Reka AI, released September 2024.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'reka-flash-20240904' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'reka-flash-20240904' as 'Reka-Flash-20240904' (Reka AI, Proprietary), linking https://docs.reka.ai/available-models. Released 2024-09: date in Reka's API snapshot id. Dated Reka API snapshot. Reka's current docs list only reka-flash (a newer model) and reka-edge as public models.

50.5±3.3comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Reka Flash (2024-09-04), out of 1132 with a score, then more from Reka AI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
552Athene-70B Nexusflow51±1local~29GB2024-07
553Qwen2 72B Instruct Alibaba51±1local~33GB2024-06
554Reka Flash (2024-09-04) Reka AI51±3comparison only2024-09
555Bielik 11B v2.0 Instruct SpeakLeash51±3local~8.5GB2024-08
556Solar Pro Preview (22B) Upstage51±7local~15GB2024-09
more from Reka AI
505Reka Flash 3 (21B) Reka AI52±6local~14GB2025-03
507Reka Core (2024-09-04) Reka AI52±3comparison only2024-09
523Reka Flash 3.1 (21B) Reka AI52±6local~14GB2025-05

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #358 of 579 * · 95% of its score · 1 test

Beats Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1272.4 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 104/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 95%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 95%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 95%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 5%
weighted average= 50.5

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json