whatmodel.sh / REBEL-Llama-3

REBEL-Llama-3 is an open-weights language model from Cornell AGI (REBEL), released May 2024. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Maker repo Cornell-AGI/REBEL-Llama-3 @ce3a039: licence tag apache-2.0. Released 2024-05: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2024-05-28).

47.2±1.7#516 of 949 LLMsfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of REBEL-Llama-3, out of 1132 with a score, then more from Cornell AGI (REBEL).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
654GLM-4 9B Chat Zhipu AI (Z.ai)47±2local~7.9GB2024-06
655Yi-1.5 34B (base) 01.AI47±3local~22GB2024-05
656REBEL-Llama-3 Cornell AGI (REBEL)47±2local~18GB2024-05
657Infinity-Instruct-3M-0625-Mistral-7B BAAI47±2local~6.1GB2024-07
658Infinity-Instruct-3M-0613-Llama3-70B BAAI47±2local~29GB2024-06
more from Cornell AGI (REBEL)
455REBEL-Llama-3-Armo-iter_1 Cornell AGI (REBEL)54±2local~18GB2024-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▄▆▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #306 of 466 * · 99% of its score · 1 test

Beats Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Gemma 4 E4B, Ministral 3 8B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, LFM2 700M, EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled31.4% ✎▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 81/122medium · avg 39%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 99%at its level

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~16.06 GB · from huggingface.co/Cornell-AGI (official)
    uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='Cornell-AGI/REBEL-Llama-3', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/Cornell-AGI ↗

$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 99%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards (tatsu-lab/alpaca_eval repository)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 99%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 47.2

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json