whatmodel.sh / image / P-Image
P-Image
↗ share
+ contribute
P-Image is a closed-weights image model from Pruna, released December 2025. Licence: proprietary.
Catalogue identity notes
Arena entry 'p-image' (text-to-image). Released 2025-12: Pruna blog '2025 Pruna recap': 'In December 2025, we launched P-Image and P-Image Edit'. Pruna's hosted text-to-image model (official Replicate model prunaai/p-image). The Arena organisation field is blank; exact name match to Pruna P-Image (as for p-video).
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of P-Image, out of 197 with a score, then more from Pruna.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96 | 52±2 | comparison only | |||
| 97 | 52±2 | api $0.0011/image +local | |||
| 98 | 51±2 | api $0.0050/image | |||
| 99 | 51±2 | api $0.019/image | |||
| 100 | 50±2 | api $0.040/image | |||
| more from Pruna | |||||
| 74 | 56±4 | api $0.010/image | |||
$ what it's good at
text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #67 of 126 * · 84% of its score · 1 test
Beats FLUX.2 [klein] 4B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails FLUX.1 Kontext [pro], Photon here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena text-to-image | 1033.2 ✎ | ▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 13/75 | 84% |
other tests1 not in a task · 13% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapidata Benchmark.ai image benchmark (overall Elo) | 890.2 ✎ | ▁▁▃▄▂█▂▁▁▂▁▁ beats 2/34 | 13% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Replicate · $0.0050/image · replicate.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per output image on Replicate: the model's billing config lists '$5 per thousand output images' ('or 200 images for $1'). Product: Replicate model API (Pruna's official model). API model: prunaai/p-image. Settings: one output image. Price basis: per-output tariff (not hardware time). Currency: USD. Replicate model page, observed 2026-10-07.
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 84%, Rapidata/text-to-image-human-… 13%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84% | |
| 1 | 13% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 50.7 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json