whatmodel.sh / image / Photon

Photon is a closed-weights image model from Luma AI.

50.6±1.9#79 of 144 image modelsfrom 4 benchmark results across 3 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of Photon, out of 197 with a score, then more from Luma AI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
97FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Black Forest Labs52±2api $0.0011/image +local~2.9GB2026-01
98P-Image Pruna51±2api $0.0050/image2025-12
99Photon Luma AI51±2api $0.019/image
100Recraft V3 Recraft50±2api $0.040/image2024-10
101FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] Black Forest Labs50±2api $0.040/image2025-05
more from Luma AI
21Uni-1.1 Luma AI67±2api $0.040/image2026-05
27Uni-1.1 Max Luma AI65±2api $0.10/image2026-05

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #66 of 126 · 84% of its score · 3 tests

Beats FLUX.2 [klein] 4B, P-Image here, though they rank higher overall. Trails FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena text-to-image1035.7 ✎▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 14/75avg 1027▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 56%typical
GenEval73.8% ✎██·▄·▄·█···▄ beats 7/8easy · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%at its level
MMMG image generation (average over 15 tasks)58.7% ✎█··█▄▄·▄▄·▄▄ beats 6/9medium · avg 51%▇▇▇▇ 10%at its level
other tests1 not in a task · 14% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Rapidata human-face generation alignment (Elo)955.5 ✎▃··▅▃··▃▃··█ beats 1/8avg 1012▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%typical

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · fal.ai · $0.019/image · fal.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD for one 1-megapixel output: fal bills fal-ai/luma-photon at $0.019 per output megapixel (price = rate × 1 MP; fal's rounding for 1024×1024 ≈ 1.05 MP is not stated; larger outputs cost proportionally more). Product: fal.ai partner API (Luma's model served through fal). API model: fal-ai/luma-photon (Luma Photon, not Photon Flash). Settings: text-to-image, 1 MP output, one image. Price basis: published per-megapixel list rate × 1 MP. The fal endpoint is public and not marked deprecated; Luma's own current Agents API lists only uni-1, uni-1-max and ray-3.2, so this is not a Luma direct tariff. Currency: USD. fal.ai official model page, observed 2026-09-26.

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 56%, MMMG: a Comprehensive and Rel… 28%, Rapidata/Face_Generation_Benc… 14%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 56%CC BY 4.0
MMMG: a Comprehensive and Reliable Benchmark for Multitask Multimodal Generation (arXiv:2505.17613v2)2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 28%CC-BY-4.0
Rapidata/Face_Generation_Benchmark (Human Face Generation Alignment) published dataset-card leaderboard1▇▇▇▇ 14%CDLA-Permissive-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 2%
weighted average= 50.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json