whatmodel.sh / Mistral Small 3 24B (2501)
Mistral Small 3 24B (2501)
↗ share
+ contribute
Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) is an open-weights language model from Mistral, released January 2025. Its published size is 23.57B parameters and a 32k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2025-01-25, 2025-01-30). Mistral Small 3 (version 25.01). Epoch labels 'mistral-small-2501' (Mistral API id; 'Mistral Small 3.0' 25.01 in Mistral's legacy table, retired 11/30/2025) and 'mistral-small-3-2501' both sit in model_metadata group 'Mistral Small 3' and name the same 2501 release, so the selection rule is applied across both labels. Distinct from mistral-small-3-2 (2506). 23,572,403,200 parameters.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Mistral Small 3 24B (2501), out of 828 with a score, then more from Mistral.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 348 | 54±1 | local | |||
| 349 | 53±5 | local | |||
| 350 | 53±1 | local | |||
| 351 | 53±1 | local | |||
| 352 | 53±1 | comparison only | |||
| more from Mistral | |||||
| 79 | 71±2 | api $2.06/M | |||
| 174 | 65±1 | api $3.00/M +local | |||
| 180 | 64±2 | comparison only | |||
$ what it's good at
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #235 of 458 * · 4.6% of its score · 1 test
Beats Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B), GLM-4.7-Flash here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, InternLM2.5 20B Chat, Gemma 2 27B IT here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| WebApp1K-React pass@1 (onekq-ai) | 55.5% ✎ | ▃▁▁█▁▄▅▃▄▇▁▄ beats 12/31 | 4.6% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #251 of 393 * · 10% of its score · 1 test
Beats Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1274.4 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 106/379 | 10% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #265 of 398 * · 30% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Molmo 2 8B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, DeepSeek-V2.5 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 (base), InternVL2-4B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATH level 5 | 44.8% ✎ | ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 36/92 | 24% |
| OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 | 6.7% ✎ | ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 38/193 | 5.2% |
other tests14 not in a task · 56% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 57/208 | 14% |
| CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 judge scale) | 74.2% ✎ | ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆▅▄▂▃ beats 66/95 | 6.1% |
| EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligence, judge Elo) | 1058.9 ✎ | ▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 7/62 | 6.0% |
| BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot average (87 tasks) | 37.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆█▃ beats 57/97 | 5.1% |
| AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, Claude Sonnet 4 judge) | 39.8% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▂▂▄█▄▅▄▄ beats 36/66 | 5.0% |
| HindiGen-v1 3C3H score (Inception, Claude 3.5 Sonnet judge) | 50.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁·▂·█▆█▇▁ beats 7/31 | 5.0% |
| Polish EQ-Bench v2 (SpeakLeash) | 70.5% ✎ | ▁··▁▁▂▂▆▅▆█▆ beats 53/70 | 4.9% |
| Judgemark v2 (LLM-as-judge for creative writing) | 63.6% ✎ | ▃▃··▃▅▅···█▃ beats 5/10 | 3.6% |
6 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 77.2% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 239/276 | 2.0% |
| EuroEval HellaSwag (English), test split, 5-shot generative MC, accuracy | 91.0% ✎ | ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 95/100 | 1.6% |
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 94.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄▃ beats 136/146 | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch) | 0.0% ✎ | █▁▁▁▁▂▁▄▂▂▁▁ beats 5/135 | 0.6% |
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 96.9% ✎ | ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 100/140 | 0.5% |
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 94.9% ✎ | ▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 89/98 | 0.0% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) · needs ~14.3 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) · needs ~14.3 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) · needs ~14.64 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run mistral-small:24b-instruct-2501-q4_K_M
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) · needs ~13.3 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/mlx-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501-4bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/mistralai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 45%, Inception Arabic/Hindi leader… 10%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 10% and 9 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json