whatmodel.sh / LLaMA 7B

LLaMA 7B is an open-weights language model from Meta, released February 2023. Its published size is 6.7B parameters. Licence: llama-1-noncommercial-research.

Catalogue identity notes

Original LLaMA (v1) base model (Touvron et al. 2023), released by Meta to approved researchers under a non-commercial licence; no official public download exists, so no run command is listed (community re-uploads such as huggyllama/* are unofficial).

29.5±0.6comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 44 benchmark results across 6 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of LLaMA 7B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Meta.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
741Llama 2 7B Chat Meta30±1local~5.8GB2023-07
742Baichuan2-7B-Base Baichuan30±1local~17GB2023-08
743LLaMA 7B Meta30±1comparison only2023-02
744MPT-7B (base) MosaicML30±1comparison only2023-05
745OLMo 7B Instruct Ai229±2local~16GB2024-02
more from Meta
24Muse Spark 1.3 Meta77±1api $2.00/M2026-09
40Muse Spark 1.2 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-08
43Muse Spark 1.1 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-07

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▃▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #511 of 524 · 7.0% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Molmo 7B-D (0924), DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, Qwen3 0.6B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Falcon3 1B Instruct, Gemma 2B IT, Granite 3.0 1B-A400M Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
HumanEval +110.3% ✎▄··▄····▄▄█▄ beats 4/6easy · avg 71%▇▇ 5.7%sharp · several runs
MBPP lab17.7% ✎▃▁▁▄▅█▄▅▃▁▂▁ beats 1/81medium · avg 63%▇ 1.4%typical
math▃▂▃▅▇▅▅█▄▁▁▁ #459 of 462 * · 3.3% of its score · 2 tests

Beats DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Base, StarCoderBase 7B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen2 0.5B Instruct, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 350M here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GSM8K lab11.0% ✎▃▂▂▅▅▆▅▇█▇▄▃ beats 4/146easy · avg 76%▇ 1.8%sharp
MATH lab2.9% ✎▃▅▂▆▅▃▅▃█▃▃▂ beats 1/29hard · avg 27%▇ 1.5%too hard for it
other tests14 not in a task · 90% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ARC Challenge +344.6% ✎▁·▁··▁▁▇▂█▆▃ beats 20/26easy · avg 85%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 28%sharp · several runs
WinoGrande +369.9% ✎▁····▁··▁▂█▄ beats 23/26easy · avg 89%▇▇▇▇▇ 12%at its level · several runs
BoolQ +375.0% ✎▂▃▂▅▆▂▅▆█▂▂▂ beats 22/26easy · avg 91%▇▇▇▇ 9.4%at its level · several runs
HellaSwag +376.2% ✎▃···▁▇▅█▇▃▁▁ beats 21/26very easy · avg 92%▇▇▇ 7.1%at its level · several runs
ARC Easy +372.9% ✎▁▁·▁▁▄▅▄█▅▁▃ beats 22/26easy · avg 88%▇▇▇ 6.6%at its level · several runs
OpenBookQA +334.4% ✎█·▁▁▃·▁▃▅▇▃▄ beats 23/26easy · avg 84%▇▇▇ 6.4%at its level · several runs
PIQA +378.7% ✎▁·▁··▁▁▃█▅█▂ beats 19/26easy · avg 88%▇▇ 3.9%blunt · at its level · several runs
SciQ +194.6% ✎▁·▁·▁·▃▅▃█▄▁ beats 23/26very easy · avg 98%▇ 3.4%several runs
6 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BIG-Bench Hard30.9% ✎███··█·█·█·█ beats 1/6easy · avg 76%▇ 3.3%sharp
Social IQA +244.8% ✎▁···▁▃█▁▃▁·▁ beats 22/26medium · avg 63%▇ 2.6%blunt · several runs
MMLU +135.2% ✎▄▄·▄···▄▄·██ beats 3/8easy · avg 77%▇ 2.6%several runs
Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (zero-shot)14.6% ✎▅····▃▅·██·█ beats 3/13medium · avg 59%▇ 1.7%typical
Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (10-shot)35.0% ✎▃▅▃··▅▃·█▃▃▅ beats 6/13easy · avg 67%▇ 1.4%at its level
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-word accuracy73.5% ✎▁··▂▁▁▁▂▆█▅▃ beats 22/26very easy · avg 89%▇ 1.0%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Stability AI — original Stabl… 38%, OLMo: Accelerating the Scienc… 18%, LLaMA: Open and Efficient Fou… 18% and 3 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json