whatmodel.sh / OPT-1.3B
OPT-1.3B
↗ share
+ contribute
OPT-1.3B is an open-weights language model from Meta, released May 2022. Its published size is 1.3B parameters and a 2k-token context window. Licence: opt-175b-license-noncommercial.
Catalogue identity notes
Meta's Open Pre-trained Transformer base model as released on Hugging Face (weights under Meta's non-commercial OPT licence).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of OPT-1.3B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Meta.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 804 | 17±2 | local | |||
| 805 | 17±2 | comparison only | |||
| 806 | 16±1 | local | |||
| 807 | 15±4 | local | |||
| 808 | 14±1 | local | |||
| more from Meta | |||||
| 24 | 77±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 40 | 75±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 43 | 75±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
$ what it's good at
other tests10 not in a task · 99% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC Easy +1 | 57.0% ✎ | ▃·▅▃▃▅·██▃██ beats 9/19 | 23% |
| WinoGrande +1 | 59.7% ✎ | ▄····▄▆▂▄▆▆█ beats 12/19 | 17% |
| SciQ | 84.5% ✎ | ▂··▂▃▂▂▆▃▃█▂ beats 8/19 | 12% |
| PIQA +1 | 71.7% ✎ | ▂·▄▄·▄▂▆▃▄█▄ beats 11/19 | 12% |
| ARC Challenge +1 | 23.1% ✎ | █··▁·▁▁·▁▂▁▂ beats 0/19 | 12% |
| BoolQ | 59.6% ✎ | ▄█▄···▄··█▄▄ beats 0/8 | 7.5% |
| LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-word accuracy | 57.9% ✎ | ▃··▅▃▃▅▅▅███ beats 10/19 | 7.5% |
| HellaSwag | 41.5% ✎ | ▃▃▃··▅····▃█ beats 1/8 | 5.8% |
2 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenBookQA | 24.0% ✎ | █······▂·▆·▂ beats 2/8 | 1.7% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 25.6% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 17/276 | 1.0% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~2.63 GB · from huggingface.co/facebook
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='facebook/opt-1.3b')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/facebook ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing… 61%, Textbooks Are All You Need II… 38%, Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboa… 1%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 61% | |
| 7 | 38% | |
| 1 | 1% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 15.7 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json