whatmodel.sh / decision / d1.1 (hosted)

d1.1 (hosted) is a closed-weights decision model from Liquid AI. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Exact named native decision endpoint liquid/d1.1; reported returned version liquid/d1.1-20261027. Kept separate from d1, d1-ultra and downloadable small d1 variants. Hosted service snapshot, not immutable weights.

68.1±1.7#32 of 355 decision modelsfrom 23 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The decision models ranked either side of d1.1 (hosted), out of 357 with a score, then more from Liquid AI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
30OneShot 27B OneShot68±2model files
31Matilda Decision v1 Maincode68±2model files
32d1.1 (hosted) Liquid AI68±2api price unknown
33VisionJEV 1.0.0 (27B) taoszhang68±1model files
34RBDash-Decision v0.2 RBDash-Team68±4model files
more from Liquid AI
21d1-ultra Liquid AI69±2api price unknown2026-10-15
61d1 (hosted) Liquid AI65±1api price unknown
198LiquidAI d1-3B Liquid AI51±1model files

see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

retrieval & classification▁▁▁·▁▁▁▁▃▃█▅ #60 of 258 · 15% of its score · 6 tests

Beats AutoTrust-JEV-27B v1.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails StartLux-Decision v1.1 0.8B, Standard One 8B SH (v4), StartLux-Decision v1.1 2B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
System One Bench: MIRACL pairwise (Arabic)89.5% ✎▂···▁··▃▄▂█▇ beats 16/29easy · avg 84%▇▇ 5.1%typical
System One Bench: MASSIVE intent (Arabic)88.0% ✎▄·▁·▁▃▃▃█▄▇▇ beats 20/29easy · avg 76%▇▇ 4.3%typical
System One Bench: MIRACL rerank (Arabic)88.5% ✎▁▂·▁▁·▂·▄▄█▇ beats 20/29easy · avg 79%▇ 2.9%typical
System One Bench: MASSIVE scenario (Arabic)73.0% ✎▃▁·▄▃▂█▂▁▁·▃ beats 20/29medium · avg 60%▇ 2.1%at its level
System One Bench: AG News (English)90.5% ✎▁···▅▁▅▂▆█▂▅ beats 20/29easy · avg 88%▇ 0.6%blunt
System One Bench: Banking77 (English)87.0% ✎█▅▆█▅▃▃▃···▂ beats 9/26very easy · avg 87%▇ 0.0%blunt · noisy
language understanding▂▂▂▃▂▅▆▃█▆▄▃ #17 of 256 · 14% of its score · 9 tests

Beats KnowLine 31B Gen1, Ainvest-Decision-27B v1.0, WeMM-JEV-27B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Clef-omni, Clef, Darwin-27B-ZTC here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
System One Bench: BoolQ (English)92.0% ✎▁▁▁▃·▁▃▃▇▇█▅ beats 26/29easy · avg 86%▇ 3.6%typical
System One Bench: OSACT4 offensive (Arabic)92.5% ✎▁······▁▃█▇▄ beats 22/29easy · avg 84%▇ 2.9%sharp
System One Bench: SST-5 (English)60.0% ✎▃·▁▁▃·▇▄▄▄█▅ beats 23/29medium · avg 51%▇ 2.3%blunt · at its level
System One Bench: SST-2 (English)98.0% ✎▁·▃▁▂▂▃▅█·▂▃ beats 29/29easy · avg 92%▇ 2.1%typical
System One Bench: XNLI Arabic (Arabic)79.3% ✎▄▁▃▁▄▇█▅▃▁·▃ beats 23/29medium · avg 68%▇ 1.1%at its level
System One Bench: XNLI French (French)83.3% ✎▂▅·▁▁▅▅█▃▁·▃ beats 21/29medium · avg 76%▇ 0.9%blunt · at its level
System One Bench: Tweet sentiment (Arabic)72.5% ✎▁······▁▁▄█▄ beats 23/29medium · avg 62%▇ 0.9%blunt · at its level
System One Bench: XNLI English (English)90.0% ✎▃·▁·▃▇█▄█▃▃▁ beats 19/29easy · avg 85%▇ 0.3%blunt · noisy
1 more test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
System One Bench: DAIR Emotion (English)60.5% ✎██▃·····▁··▁ beats 23/29medium · avg 59%▇ 0.0%blunt · at its level
knowledge & reasoning▁▂▂▂▂▃▃▅▅▆█▂ #43 of 263 * · 22% of its score · 1 test

Beats vera-large, OneJev1.6-27B, baselabs elephant-1 (9B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Solar Decide, Clef-omni, GPT-6 Luna Decisions here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Etsabary · 1342 text decisions77.8% ✎▁··▂·▃▅▁▃▃▂█ beats 15/24medium · avg 47%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 22%sharp
vision▁·▃▂▃▃▇▄▄█▄▃ #2 of 79 · 42% of its score · 6 tests

Beats Fastino GLiDE 1.2, StartLux-Decision v1.1 27B, vLLM-SR d3-ultra (Decision 3.0, 27B) here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Etsabary · 200 image decisions72.0% ✎▂▂··▂▃▂·█▃▂▂ beats 9/14medium · avg 45%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 16%sharp · at its level
System One Bench: Image object count91.5% ✎▃····▃█▃▅·█▃ beats 6/11easy · avg 71%▇▇ 5.8%sharp
System One Bench: Arabic sentiment screenshot61.0% ✎▄··▄··▂···▆█ beats 7/11very hard · avg 37%▇▇ 5.8%sharp · at its level · noisy
System One Bench: SST-2 screenshot96.5% ✎█···███·█·▄▄ beats 10/11easy · avg 87%▇▇ 5.1%sharp
System One Bench: Visual yes/no questions89.5% ✎▂······▃█▃·▃ beats 10/11medium · avg 80%▇▇ 5.1%typical
System One Bench: Oxford pets classification90.5% ✎███·█▄▄·▄··▄ beats 10/11easy · avg 77%▇▇ 4.2%typical
workflows▁▁▁▂▁▂▂▆█▄▁▁ #32 of 114 * · 4.9% of its score · 1 test

Trails StartLux-Decision v1.1 2B, xor (DecisionBench 679decd4), openjev-sglang (DecisionBench 1355db6a) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
System One Bench: Typed decisions (English)72.0% ✎▁▁·▁▁▁▅▄▇██▁ beats 17/29medium · avg 63%▇▇ 4.9%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · OpenRouter · price unknown · openrouter.ai ↗

Model repository and documentation: openrouter.ai ↗

$ how the score was worked out · System One Bench (Ali Alhashi… 60%, Etsabary · decision benchmarks 39%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
System One Bench (Ali Alhashimi)21CC-BY-4.0
Etsabary · decision benchmarks2MIT
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 68.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json