whatmodel.sh / Ling-lite-1.5

Ling-lite-1.5 is an open-weights language model from inclusionAI (Ant Group), released May 2025. Its published size is 16.8B parameters (2.75B active per token). Licence: mit.

Catalogue identity notes

Maker repo inclusionAI/Ling-lite-1.5 @ef1ac33: licence tag mit. 16,801,974,272 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata; active 2.75B per token (Ling card: 'Ling-lite has 16.8 billion parameters with 2.75 billion activated parameters'). Released 2025-05: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2025-05-11).

51.8±6.4#396 of 949 LLMsfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Ling-lite-1.5, out of 1132 with a score, then more from inclusionAI (Ant Group).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
517Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct NVIDIA52±1local~43GB2024-10
518Palmyra X4 (palmyra-x-004) Writer52±4comparison only2024-10
519Ling-lite-1.5 inclusionAI (Ant Group)52±6local~13GB2025-05
520Nemotron-4 340B Instruct NVIDIA52±2comparison only2024-06
521Aya Expanse 32B Cohere52±2api $0.75/M +local~22GB2024-10
more from inclusionAI (Ant Group)
87Ling 3.0 Flash (124B-A5B) inclusionAI (Ant Group)71±2api $0.090/M +local~75GB2026-08
111Ring-2.6-1T inclusionAI (Ant Group)69±2comparison only2026-05
310Ling-flash-2.0 inclusionAI (Ant Group)59±2local~40GB2025-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #259 of 334 * · 82% of its score · 1 test

Beats o3-mini, Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Granite 4.0 1B, SmolLM3 3B, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BFCL v354.5% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█▅▄▁▁ beats 54/114medium · avg 52%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 82%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Ling-lite-1.5 · needs ~11.2 GB · from huggingface.co/mradermacher
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf mradermacher/Ling-lite-1.5-GGUF:Q4_K_M
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf mradermacher/Ling-lite-1.5-GGUF:Q4_K_M

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Ling-lite-1.5 · needs ~11.2 GB · from huggingface.co/mradermacher

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/Ling-lite-1.5-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

Ollama

version

  1. Install Ollama

    download it (macOS / Windows) ↗

    Linux
    curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
  2. Run Ling-lite-1.5 · needs ~11.2 GB · from huggingface.co/mradermacher
    chat in the terminal
    ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/Ling-lite-1.5-GGUF:Q4_K_M

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~33.6 GB · from huggingface.co/inclusionAI (official)
    uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='inclusionAI/Ling-lite-1.5', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto', trust_remote_code=True)('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/inclusionAI ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Berkeley Function Calling Lea… 82%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 82%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%
weighted average= 51.8

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json