whatmodel.sh / image / LCM-SSD-1B
LCM-SSD-1B
↗ share
+ contribute
LCM-SSD-1B is an open-weights image model from latent-consistency, released November 2023. Its published size is 1.33B parameters. Licence: openrail++.
Catalogue identity notes
latent-consistency/lcm-ssd-1b (LCM distillation of SSD-1B). Memory estimated as for SSD-1B (1.3B).
Model information sources
UNet only: HF Hub safetensors total for the official UNet-only repo (pinned revision), 1,331,416,324 = diffusion_pytorch_model.safetensors; used with the segmind/SSD-1B pipeline, whose text encoders and VAE are not included. Observed 2026-10-07.
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of LCM-SSD-1B, out of 197 with a score, then more from latent-consistency.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173 | 32±7 | comparison only | |||
| 174 | 32±7 | local | |||
| 175 | 32±4 | local | |||
| 176 | 32±4 | local | |||
| 177 | 31±3 | local | |||
| more from latent-consistency | |||||
| 168 | 34±3 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #114 of 126 * · 94% of its score · 1 test
Beats Latent Diffusion text2img-large (LDM-KL-8-G, LAION-400M), VQ-Diffusion (ITHQ), VILA-U 7B (256px) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails CogView2, Versatile Diffusion v1.0, Dreamlike Photoreal 2.0 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EvalMuse-40K model ranking (FGA-BLIP2 overall alignment) | 2.66 / 5 ✎ | █▄·▄██▄▄█▄▄▄ beats 3/14 | 94% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~3.6 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/latent-consistency (official)
uv run --with diffusers --with transformers --with accelerate --with torch python -c "import torch; from diffusers import UNet2DConditionModel, DiffusionPipeline, LCMScheduler; u=UNet2DConditionModel.from_pretrained('latent-consistency/lcm-ssd-1b', torch_dtype=torch.float16, variant='fp16'); p=DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('segmind/SSD-1B', unet=u, torch_dtype=torch.float16, variant='fp16'); p.scheduler=LCMScheduler.from_config(p.scheduler.config); p.to('cuda'); p('a cat holding a sign', num_inference_steps=4, guidance_scale=1.0).images[0].save('out.png')"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/latent-consistency ↗
$ how the score was worked out · EvalMuse-40K: A Reliable and… 94%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 6% | |
| weighted average | = 32.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json