whatmodel.sh / image / LCM-SDXL

LCM-SDXL is an open-weights image model from latent-consistency, released November 2023. Its published size is 2.57B parameters. Licence: openrail++.

Catalogue identity notes

latent-consistency/lcm-sdxl full UNet distillation (not the LCM-LoRA). Memory estimated as for SDXL 1.0.

Model information sources

· Parameter count ↗

UNet only: HF Hub safetensors total for the official UNet-only repo (pinned revision), 2,567,545,604 = diffusion_pytorch_model.safetensors; used with the SDXL base pipeline, whose text encoders and VAE are not included. Observed 2026-10-07.

34.0±2.5#123 of 144 image modelsfrom 3 benchmark results across 3 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of LCM-SDXL, out of 197 with a score, then more from latent-consistency.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
166IF-XL DeepFloyd35±2local~29GB2023-04
167Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 Stability AI34±1api $0.0019/image +local~4.9GB2023-07
168LCM-SDXL latent-consistency34±3local~8.9GB2023-11
169OmniGen (v1) BAAI34±4local~9GB2024-10
170SDXL-Turbo Stability AI34±2local~4.9GB2023-11
more from latent-consistency
175LCM-SSD-1B latent-consistency32±4local~3.6GB2023-11

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #109 of 126 * · 44% of its score · 1 test

Beats Latent Diffusion text2img-large (LDM-KL-8-G, LAION-400M), VQ-Diffusion (ITHQ) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails IF-L, SDXL-Turbo here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
EvalMuse-40K model ranking (FGA-BLIP2 overall alignment)2.77 / 5 ✎█▄·▄██▄▄█▄▄▄ beats 4/14easy · avg 3.83 / 5▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 44%at its level
other tests2 not in a task · 54% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
EvalAlign human text-image alignment score5.1800 mean human alignment score ✎█▄▄·█·▄█▄▄·▄ beats 9/11avg 6.285 mean human alignment score▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 40%typical
MS-COCO 10K FID (whole image) ↓ (SDXL-Lightning protocol)21.8500 FID ✎█··██······█ beats 2/3avg 11.695 FID▇▇▇▇▇ 14%typical

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~8.9 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/latent-consistency (official)
    uv run --with diffusers --with transformers --with accelerate --with torch python -c "import torch; from diffusers import UNet2DConditionModel, DiffusionPipeline, LCMScheduler; u=UNet2DConditionModel.from_pretrained('latent-consistency/lcm-sdxl', torch_dtype=torch.float16, variant='fp16'); p=DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0', unet=u, torch_dtype=torch.float16, variant='fp16'); p.scheduler=LCMScheduler.from_config(p.scheduler.config); p.to('cuda'); p('a cat holding a sign', num_inference_steps=4, guidance_scale=8.0).images[0].save('out.png')"

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/latent-consistency ↗

$ how the score was worked out · EvalMuse-40K: A Reliable and… 44%, EvalAlign: Supervised Fine-Tu… 40%, SDXL-Lightning: Progressive A… 14%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json