whatmodel.sh / video / Kling 1.0

Kling 1.0

+ contribute
Update model informationAdd a place to run itAdd a test resultPropose a benchmarkCorrect a benchmark scoreEdit data on GitHub

Kling 1.0 is a closed-weights video model from Kuaishou (Kling AI), released June 2024. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

First Kling release (public testing from June 2024 per Kuaishou's 10 June 2024 release); mode not stated in the evaluations used.

35.0±6.6comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The video models ranked either side of Kling 1.0, out of 139 with a score, then more from Kuaishou (Kling AI).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
115Pika 2.2 Pika36±2api $0.040/sec2025-02
116Allegro Rhymes AI35±2local~9.3GB2024-10
117Kling 1.0 Kuaishou (Kling AI)35±7comparison only2024-06
118VideoCrafter2 Tencent AI Lab34±2local~9.4GB2024-01
119Cosmos-1.0-Autoregressive-4B NVIDIA34±5comparison only2025-01
more from Kuaishou (Kling AI)
22Kling 3.0 Kuaishou (Kling AI)68±4api $0.084/sec2026-02
31Kling O3 Pro Kuaishou (Kling AI)64±4api $0.11/sec
34Kling 2.6 Pro Kuaishou (Kling AI)59±2api $0.070/sec2025-12

see all video models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to video▇▅▄▆█▆▇▂▃▃▂▄ #74 of 94 * · 81% of its score · 1 test

Trails VideoCrafter2 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ChronoMagic-Bench-150 GPT4o-MTScore (time-lapse metamorphosis)54.8% ✎▄·▄█▄▄▄·▄·▄█ beats 6/10medium · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 81%at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmar… 81%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmark for Metamorphic Evaluation of Text-to-Time-lapse Video Generation1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 81%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇▇▇▇ 19%
weighted average= 35.0

$ improve this page

Update model informationAdd a place to run itAdd a test resultPropose a benchmarkCorrect a benchmark scoreEdit data on GitHub

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json