whatmodel.sh / Inkling (975B-A41B)

Inkling (975B-A41B) is an open-weights language model from Thinking Machines, released July 2026. Its published size is 975B parameters (41B active per token) and a 1M-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.

69.7±0.7#88 of 719 LLMsfrom 30 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Inkling (975B-A41B), out of 828 with a score, then more from Thinking Machines.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
94Qwen3-Max (2026-01-23) Alibaba70±1comparison only2026-01
95MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) Xiaomi70±1api $0.65/M +local~163GB2026-04
96Inkling (975B-A41B) Thinking Machines70±1api $1.73/M +local~156GB2026-07
97Muse Glimmer 30B Meta70±1api $0.64/M +local~19GB2026-08
98Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B NVIDIA69±1api $1.35/M +local~89GB2026-06
more from Thinking Machines
90Inkling Small (266B-A12B) Thinking Machines70±1api $0.64/M +local~86GB2026-07

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #79 of 300 · 23% of its score · 10 tests

Beats GPT-5, Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails MiniMax-M2.7, MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B), Qwen3.6 27B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggregate IPS)-0.1086 IPS ✎▁▁▃▄▂▃▇█▂▂▁▃ beats 2/49avg -0.312 IPS▇▇▇▇ 9.1%sharp
SWE-bench Verified lab77.6% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 114/131hard · avg 26%▇ 2.8%sharp · small run
τ³-bench banking_knowledge (v1.0.1 grading)25.0% ✎▃▃▂▃·▆▃▂█▅▅▂ beats 8/25very hard · avg 4.1%▇ 2.7%typical
Terminal-Bench 2.1 lab63.8% ✎▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▄█▃▇ beats 26/56hard · avg 17%▇ 2.6%at its level · small run
MCP-Atlas (public set) lab78.8% ✎▂·▁▂▁·▁▃█▆▆▂ beats 34/37medium · avg 36%▇ 1.6%at its level · small run
Humanity's Last Exam with tools lab46.0% ✎▂▂▂▁▄▂▃▆█▇▂▆ beats 21/54hard · avg 16%▇ 1.3%at its level · small run
BrowseComp with context management lab77.1% ✎▅·▅▃·█▃·█▅·▃ beats 6/14medium · avg 44%▇ 1.2%small run
Toolathlon-Verified lab45.5% ✎▂·▂▂▅▃···▂██ beats 3/18hard · avg 28%▇ 0.8%blunt · at its level · small run
2 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
SWE-bench Pro lab54.3% ✎▅▃▃·▃·▅▅▅█▃▃ beats 5/15hard · avg 30%▇ 0.7%blunt · at its level · small run
τ³-bench Banking lab23.7% ✎▂▂·▅█▂▂▃▂▅▂▃ beats 17/20very hard · avg 5.9%▇ 0.6%blunt · small run
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #80 of 458 · 13% of its score · 4 tests

Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, GLM-4.7, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1412.6 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 48/119avg 981▇▇▇ 8.1%sharp
SWE-bench Verified lab77.6% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 114/131hard · avg 26%▇ 2.8%sharp · small run
SciCode (level unspecified) lab46.1% ✎▁····▃▄▄▄█▆▂ beats 31/34hard · avg 18%▇ 1.2%at its level · small run
SWE-bench Pro lab54.3% ✎▅▃▃·▃·▅▅▅█▃▃ beats 5/15hard · avg 30%▇ 0.7%blunt · at its level · small run
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #63 of 393 * · 4.5% of its score · 1 test

Beats GPT-5.2, Qwen3.8 27B, LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 4 31B, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1441.4 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 299/379avg 1268▇▇ 4.5%blunt
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #89 of 398 · 37% of its score · 5 tests

Beats Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.5, MiniMax-M3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemini 2.5 Flash, Granite 4.2 30B, INTELLECT-3 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v233.3% ✎▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▅▃▃ beats 21/82very hard · avg 1.2%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 21%sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tier 4 v24.9% ✎▁▂▃▂█▅▂▂▁▁▁▁ beats 10/63very hard · avg 0.1%▇▇▇ 7.7%sharp
HMMT February 2026 lab86.3% ✎▃▃▂▃·██▆█▅▃▅ beats 26/33medium · avg 38%▇ 3.0%sharp · small run
AIME 2026 lab97.1% ✎▁▁▁▂▁▂▆█▆▃·▁ beats 48/49easy · avg 66%▇ 2.9%sharp · maxed out · small run
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202588.9% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 140/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇ 2.2%sharp · noisy
vision & documents▁▁▃▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█▄ #65 of 147 * · 3.0% of its score · 2 tests

Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp), GPT-5, Inkling Small (266B-A12B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 4 26B-A4B, Claude Haiku 4.5, Qwen3.6 Flash here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
CharXiv (reasoning questions) lab78.1% ✎▂▅▃▅▅▆▆▅▆█▆▂ beats 72/100medium · avg 40%▇ 1.6%small run
MMMU Pro lab73.5% ✎▂▃▁▃▆▇▃▇▇██▅ beats 35/52medium · avg 44%▇ 1.4%at its level · small run
web search█··········█ #2 of 2 * · 2.5% of its score · 2 tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Humanity's Last Exam with tools lab46.0% ✎▂▂▂▁▄▂▃▆█▇▂▆ beats 21/54hard · avg 16%▇ 1.3%at its level · small run
BrowseComp with context management lab77.1% ✎▅·▅▃·█▃·█▅·▃ beats 6/14medium · avg 44%▇ 1.2%small run
other tests9 not in a task · 23% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond +188.3% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 162/208hard · avg 40%▇▇▇▇ 9.4%sharp · several runs
SimpleQA Verified +140.3% ✎▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▃▂▅ beats 33/78very hard · avg 8.0%▇ 2.7%at its level · several runs
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)21.0% ✎█▁▁▁▁▂▁▄▂▂▁▁ beats 85/135very hard · avg 5.9%▇ 2.4%sharp · noisy
Humanity's Last Exam lab29.7% ✎▁▁▁▃▆▆▇██▆▁▃ beats 69/104very hard · avg 5.8%▇ 2.0%at its level · small run
Global-MMLU-Lite lab88.7% ✎▂···▂·▂▂▂·██ beats 8/12medium · avg 59%▇ 1.9%small run
CritPt lab5.4% ✎▄···▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄ beats 4/9very hard · avg 1.1%▇ 1.7%too hard for it · small run
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average (Miðeind, Sept 2026 suite)46.5% ✎▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄█ beats 17/38very hard · avg 14%▇ 1.6%at its level
IFBench (aggregation unspecified) lab79.8% ✎▃▇▂▄▅▅▂▄▄▆█▇ beats 74/80medium · avg 45%▇ 1.3%small run
1 more test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
MMAU lab77.2% ✎█··········█ beats 1/1—not counted yet: no other model in the same run to compare it with

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Deep Infra · $1.72/M · $0.95 in / $4.05 out per 1M tokens · 1M context · deepinfra.com ↗ · price sourceStandard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ.

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Inkling (975B-A41B) · needs ~585.5 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf unsloth/inkling-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf unsloth/inkling-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Inkling (975B-A41B) · needs ~585.5 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/inkling-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/thinkingmachines ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 41%, thinkingmachines/Inkling-Smal… 33%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 22% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Epoch AI — internal evaluations6▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 41%CC BY 4.0
thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small model card · lab-reported19▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 33%Apache-2.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset3▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 22%CC BY 4.0
τ²/τ³-bench leaderboard: Sierra's own evaluation runs1▇ 3%MIT
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard1▇ 2%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 0%
weighted average= 69.7

not counted (1)

thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small model cardMMAU [correct]77.2%fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json