whatmodel.sh / Grok 4.1

Grok 4.1 is a closed-weights language model from SpaceXAI (xAI), released November 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entries 'grok-4.1-thinking' (text, webdev), 'grok-4.1' (text). Released 2025-11: xAI 'Grok 4.1' post dated Nov 17, 2025. xAI: 'Grok 4.1 Thinking (code name: quasarflux)' and 'Grok 4.1 in its non-reasoning mode (code name: tensor)'. Distinct from Grok 4.1 Fast (grok-4-1-fast-reasoning). No xAI API id verified for Grok 4.1 itself.

64.9±2.0comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 2 benchmark results across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Grok 4.1, out of 1132 with a score, then more from SpaceXAI (xAI).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
192EXAONE 4.5 33B LG AI Research65±2local~24GB2026-04
193gemma-2-9b-it-WPO-HB wzhouad (WPO)65±2local~7.6GB2024-08
194Grok 4.1 SpaceXAI (xAI)65±2comparison only2025-11
195Qwen3.5 Flash Alibaba65±1api $0.17/M2026-02
196ChatGPT-4o (2025-03-26) OpenAI65±2comparison only2025-03
more from SpaceXAI (xAI)
30Grok 4.6 SpaceXAI (xAI)77±1api $3.00/M2026-08
42Grok 4.5 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-07
47Grok 4.7 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▂▁ #212 of 549 * · 63% of its score · 1 test

Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512, Phi-4-reasoning 14B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1213.8 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 6/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 63%sharp
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #44 of 579 * · 35% of its score · 1 test

Beats GPT-6 Sol, MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B), GPT-6 Luna here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1465.2 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 336/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 35%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 98%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 98%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 2%
weighted average= 64.9

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json