whatmodel.sh / Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct

Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct is an open-weights language model from IBM, released October 2024. Its published size is 3.3B parameters (0.8B active per token) and a 4k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

IBM granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct (ibm-granite/granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct @51ced9b, created 2024-10-03, apache-2.0, 3,374,295,552 params; card '# Parameters 3.3B', '# Active Parameters 800M'). Lab rows from the Granite 3.0 paper Table 11 (MoE instruction models, IBM's harness, with the catalogued Llama-3.2 1B column) joining the existing Table-10 runs of that source; independent EuroEval rows.

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗

Card architecture table '# Parameters 3.3B' / '# Active Parameters 800M' (HF safetensors metadata 3,374,295,552).

34.7±1.0#604 of 719 LLMsfrom 16 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct, out of 828 with a score, then more from IBM.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
697Falcon 40B (base) TII35±1local~27GB2023-05
698StarCoder2 7B BigCode35±1local~6.1GB2024-02
699Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct IBM35±1local~3.7GB2024-10
700DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat DeepSeek35±2local~5.7GB2023-11
701StarCoder 15.5B BigCode35±1local~11GB2023-04
more from IBM
192Granite 4.2 30B IBM63±1api $0.28/M +local~19GB2026-08
239Granite 4.2 8B IBM60±1api $0.11/M +local~6.6GB2026-08
276Granite 4.2 3B IBM57±1api $0.052/M +local~3.7GB2026-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #409 of 458 * · 16% of its score · 2 tests

Beats DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B, Qwen3.5 2B, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct, DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
HumanEval lab39.6% ✎▄·▄█·▄·▄···█ beats 2/7easy · avg 81%▇▇▇▇ 11%sharp · at its level
MBPP lab27.4% ✎▄···▄·▄▄█··█ beats 1/7medium · avg 64%▇▇ 5.0%at its level
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #348 of 393 * · 3.3% of its score · 1 test

Beats Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct, Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct (June 2024 update) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct, Granite 4.0 H 350M here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab42.5% ✎▄····█·▄··██ beats 2/7easy · avg 68%▇ 3.3%at its level
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #361 of 398 * · 16% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Yi 34B Chat, Llama 3 8B Instruct, Command R (03-2024) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 1B, Stable Code 3B, Qwen3 0.6B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GSM8K lab47.5% ✎█▄····▄··█▄▄ beats 3/7easy · avg 81%▇▇▇ 8.2%sharp · at its level
MATH (subset unspecified) lab19.9% ✎▄···▄▄▄▄··█▄ beats 2/7medium · avg 53%▇▇▇ 7.5%typical
other tests11 not in a task · 65% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BIG-Bench Hard lab37.7% ✎▃▃···▃··█··▅ beats 2/7medium · avg 67%▇▇▇▇▇ 13%sharp
WinoGrande lab67.0% ✎█···▄▄▄▄···█ beats 2/7easy · avg 84%▇▇▇▇ 10%at its level
MMLU lab50.2% ✎▄····▄·▄▄█·█ beats 2/7easy · avg 77%▇▇▇ 8.0%at its level
GPQA (subset unspecified) lab26.9% ✎▄·▄··▄··▄█·█ beats 2/7hard · avg 39%▇▇▇ 6.4%sharp · too hard for it
HellaSwag lab71.9% ✎▄·▄··█▄·▄·▄▄ beats 3/7easy · avg 87%▇▇ 6.0%at its level
BoolQ lab78.6% ✎▄▄····▄▄·█·█ beats 2/7easy · avg 91%▇▇ 5.8%at its level
MMLU-Pro lab20.5% ✎▄·····█··█▄█ beats 2/7medium · avg 47%▇▇ 5.7%typical
ARC Challenge lab50.9% ✎▄····█··▄▄▄█ beats 3/7easy · avg 78%▇▇ 3.9%sharp · at its level · noisy
3 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
OpenBookQA lab40.8% ✎▄▄··▄··▄·█▄▄ beats 3/7medium · avg 60%▇ 3.7%typical
EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy55.8% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▃▄█▄▃ beats 27/146easy · avg 83%▇ 1.3%at its level · noisy
Social IQA lab60.0% ✎▃·····▃··█▃▅ beats 3/7medium · avg 68%▇ 1.0%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct · needs ~2.1 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct · needs ~2.1 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/granite-3.0-3b-a800m-instruct-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

Ollama

  1. Install Ollama

    download it (macOS / Windows) ↗

    Linux
    curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
  2. Run Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct · needs ~2.1 GB · from ollama.com
    chat in the terminal
    ollama run granite3-moe:3b

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ibm-granite ↗

$ how the score was worked out · IBM Granite 3.0 Language Mode… 98%, EuroEval leaderboards (result… 1%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
IBM Granite 3.0 Language Models technical report (GitHub) · lab-reported15▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 98%Apache-2.0
EuroEval leaderboards (results collection), English generative leaderboard1▇ 1%MIT
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 0%
weighted average= 34.7

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json