whatmodel.sh / GLM-4-Plus

GLM-4-Plus is a closed-weights language model from Z.ai, released August 2024.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'glm-4-plus' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'glm-4-plus' as 'GLM-4-Plus' (Zhipu AI, Proprietary), linking https://bigmodel.cn/dev/howuse/glm-4. Released 2024-08: Zhipu GLM-4-Plus announcement (KDD 2024, late August 2024). Arena name equals the undated API id glm-4-plus. The id is still documented on BigModel, but a later '0111' snapshot also appeared on the Arena, so the current endpoint is not asserted to be the rated checkpoint.

55.9±3.3comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of GLM-4-Plus, out of 1132 with a score, then more from Z.ai.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
383DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B DeepSeek56±1api $1.59/M +local~21GB2025-01
384Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct Alibaba56±1local~46GB2025-01
385GLM-4-Plus Z.ai56±3comparison only2024-08
386Granite 4.1 30B IBM56±1local~19GB2026-04
387Baichuan-M2-32B Baichuan56±4local~22GB2025-08
more from Z.ai
33GLM-5.3 Z.ai76±1api $2.15/M +local~239GB2026-08
53GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai74±1api $0.24/M +local~103GB2026-08
59GLM-5.2 Z.ai74±1api $2.15/M +local~121GB2026-06

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #273 of 579 * · 95% of its score · 1 test

Beats Granite 4.2 8B, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking, Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking, Gemma 3 12B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1319.4 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 152/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 95%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 95%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 95%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 5%
weighted average= 55.9

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json