whatmodel.sh / GLM-4 (0520)

GLM-4 (0520) is a closed-weights language model from Z.ai, released May 2024.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'glm-4-0520' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'glm-4-0520' as 'GLM-4-0520' (Zhipu AI, Proprietary), linking https://open.bigmodel.cn/dev/api#language. Released 2024-05: date in Zhipu's API id glm-4-0520 (May 2024 GLM-4 upgrade, per Zhipu's GLM tech report). Arena name equals the API id; no longer a public pay-as-you-go model on BigModel.

52.1±1.2comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 10 benchmark results across 4 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of GLM-4 (0520), out of 828 with a score, then more from Z.ai.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
375LFM2.5 8B-A1B Liquid AI52±1local~6.5GB2026-05
376GPT-4 (0314) OpenAI52±1comparison only2023-03
377GLM-4 (0520) Z.ai52±1comparison only2024-05
378ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Baidu52±1comparison only2025-06
379Bielik 11B v2.2 Instruct SpeakLeash52±3local~8.5GB2024-08
more from Z.ai
33GLM-5.3 Z.ai76±1api $2.15/M +local~239GB2026-08
52GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai74±1api $0.24/M +local~103GB2026-08
57GLM-5.2 Z.ai74±1api $2.15/M +local~121GB2026-06

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #150 of 340 * · 2.0% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BFCL (version not stated) lab81.8% ✎█·········██ beats 4/5easy · avg 78%▇ 2.0%blunt
coding█··········█ #1 of 2 * · 8.4% of its score · 1 test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
HumanEval lab78.5% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▃▅▅█▃▂▁ beats 157/190easy · avg 75%▇▇▇ 8.4%sharp · small run
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #297 of 463 · 56% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judge)63.8% ✎▂▁▁▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 44/60medium · avg 52%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 32%sharp · at its level
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024)1202.0 ✎▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 81/95avg 1201▇▇▇▇▇ 12%blunt
LMArena (text)1273.4 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 105/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇ 12%blunt
math█··········█ #1 of 2 * · 12% of its score · 2 tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GSM8K lab93.3% ✎▂▂▂▅▅▆▅▇█▇▄▃ beats 132/146very easy · avg 88%▇▇▇ 6.6%sharp · small run
MATH (subset unspecified) lab61.3% ✎▂▄▄▃█▇▅▆▄▃▄▁ beats 35/80medium · avg 60%▇▇ 5.1%at its level · small run
other tests3 not in a task · 22% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA (subset unspecified) lab39.9% ✎▂▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█▄▃ beats 37/104hard · avg 38%▇▇▇ 8.2%sharp · small run
BIG-Bench Hard lab84.7% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅█▃▄▁ beats 117/129easy · avg 80%▇▇▇ 7.8%sharp · small run
MMLU lab83.3% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▅█▃▆▃ beats 148/183easy · avg 79%▇▇ 5.6%small run

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · ChatGLM: A Family of Large La… 44%, Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderbo… 32%, Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 12% and 1 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools (Team GLM, arXiv 2406.12793v2) · lab-reported7▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 44%CC BY 4.0
Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard (repository README, pre-v2)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 32%Apache-2.0
Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation (arXiv:2409.00696v3)1▇▇▇▇ 12%CC-BY-4.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇ 12%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 52.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json