whatmodel.sh / Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (04-17)

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (04-17) is a closed-weights language model from Google, released April 2025. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2025-04-17). Preview API model gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17; distinct from GA gemini-2-5-flash. Gemini API changelog announced its deprecation for July 15, 2025; not listed as available.

62.8±1.4comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 6 benchmark results across 6 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (04-17), out of 828 with a score, then more from Google.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
192Granite 4.2 30B IBM63±1api $0.28/M +local~19GB2026-08
193o1-preview OpenAI63±1comparison only2024-09
194Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (04-17) Google63±1comparison only2025-04
195GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai63±1api $0.42/M +local~35GB2025-07
196Qwen3.5 9B Alibaba63±1api $0.11/M +local~7.4GB2026-03
more from Google
9Gemini 4 Argon (limited preview) Google82±1limited preview2026-09
23Gemini 3.8 Flash Google77±1api $1.50/M2026-09
32Gemini 3.7 Flash Google76±1api $1.50/M2026-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #166 of 524 · 77% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Phi-4-reasoning 14B, DeepSeek V3 0324, Devstral Small 2 24B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, two attempts)47.1% ✎▂·▂▃▅▂▃█▆▄▂▂ beats 24/49very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 54%sharp · at its level
LiveCodeBench official (Aug 1, 2024–May 1, 2025)60.6% ✎▃▃▅▃··▃▅█▅▅▃ beats 7/15hard · avg 25%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%at its level
WebApp1K-Duo-React pass@1 (onekq-ai)57.0% ✎▁··▁·▁▁▁▆█▇█ beats 8/45hard · avg 32%▇▇▇▇ 9.1%at its level
math▁▂▃▅▇▅▅█▄▁▁▁ #142 of 462 * · 18% of its score · 1 test

Beats Claude Sonnet 4.6, MiniMax-M3, MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Nemotron-Cascade-8B, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202573.1% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 106/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%sharp · at its level · noisy
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▄▇▇█▃ #105 of 182 * · 3.1% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, GPT-4.1 mini here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
MSEarth-Bench Earth-science figure MCQ (Overall accuracy)57.2% ✎█·██····██·█ beats 3/5hard · avg 48%▇ 3.1%blunt · at its level
other tests1 not in a task · 0.6% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)98.7% ✎▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▃▁ beats 132/140very easy · avg 94%▇ 0.6%blunt · maxed out · noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Aider polyglot benchmark runs 54%, Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 18%, LiveCodeBench official websit… 14% and 3 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json