whatmodel.sh / DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct
DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct
↗ share
+ contribute
DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct is an open-weights language model from DeepSeek, released October 2023. Its published size is 1.35B parameters and a 16k-token context window. Licence: deepseek.
Catalogue identity notes
Maker repo deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct @e063262: licence tag other (deepseek). 1,346,471,936 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2023-10: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-10-29). DeepSeek-Coder v1 instruct model. Ollama tags deepseek-coder:1.3b-instruct-q4_K_M, deepseek-coder:1.3b-instruct-q8_0 (sizes as listed on the tags page, observed 2026-09-29).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct, out of 828 with a score, then more from DeepSeek.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 579 | 43±2 | local | |||
| 580 | 43±1 | local | |||
| 581 | 43±1 | local | |||
| 582 | 43±3 | local | |||
| 583 | 43±2 | local | |||
| more from DeepSeek | |||||
| 21 | 78±1 | api $0.26/M +local | |||
| 31 | 76±1 | api $1.63/M +local | |||
| 35 | 76±3 | comparison only | |||
$ what it's good at
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #337 of 458 · 83% of its score · 10 tests
Beats GLM-4.7-Flash, LFM2.5 2.6B, LFM2.5 8B-A1B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct (Apr 2024), DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat, WizardLM 70B V1.0 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval +1 | 65.9% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▃▄▆▅█▃▁▁ beats 51/99 | 47% |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▁▃▄▄▄█▃▁ beats 53/99 | 23% |
| LiveCodeBench official (Jan 1–Nov 1, 2024) | 6.5% ✎ | ▁▃·▁▂▄▆█▅▂·▂ beats 1/31 | 4.3% |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% ✎ | ▁···▁▁▂▅▇█▆▂ beats 28/75 | 4.0% |
| CRUXEval-I | 27.2% ✎ | ▁··▃▅▂█▇▁··▁ beats 1/22 | 1.3% |
| CRUXEval-O | 28.7% ✎ | ▁·▃▃▁█▁▂···▁ beats 1/22 | 1.3% |
| CodeReviewQA: solution identification (hard), invariant accuracy | 0.0% ✎ | ▃··▁▂▂▃▂█▃▄▂ beats 3/47 | 0.8% |
| CodeReviewQA: change localisation (hard), invariant accuracy | 0.0% ✎ | █▂▁▁▂▂▂▃▅▅▅▇ beats 4/47 | 0.7% |
2 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| CodeReviewQA: automated code refinement, exact match rate | 11.7% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▂▂▃█▅▄ beats 7/47 | 0.6% |
| CodeReviewQA: change type recognition, invariant accuracy | 1.9% ✎ | ▁▁▃······▁▃█ beats 3/47 | 0.0% |
other tests3 not in a task · 17% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EvoEval (overall) | 34.9% ✎ | ▂▂▃▄▄█▁▄▅▃▁▃ beats 24/42 | 10% |
| BigCodeBench (Complete) | 29.3% ✎ | ▂▁▁▄▂▅▇█▆▂▂▂ beats 10/58 | 3.8% |
| BigCodeBench (Instruct) | 22.7% ✎ | ▃▂·▆▆██▆▅▃▃▃ beats 1/33 | 3.7% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct · needs ~0.9 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBlokechat in the terminal
llama cli -hf TheBloke/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf TheBloke/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct · needs ~0.9 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBloke
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Instruct · needs ~0.874 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run deepseek-coder:1.3b-instruct-q4_K_M
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/deepseek-ai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · EvalPlus / EvalPerf published… 57%, Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top… 26%, BigCodeBench paper (Zhuo et a… 7% and 3 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json