whatmodel.sh / decision / Verdict 1.4 (JevBench mini)

Verdict 1.4 (JevBench mini) is a source-available decision implementation from Heman10x.

Catalogue identity notes

JevBench 0.1.0 mini tested configuration verdict: Encoder, option markers; base ModernBERT-base; readout GLiClass bi-encoder head, RLCD/Brier calibration. OpenJev server (razorback16/openjev), which reimplements Verdict 1.4's prompt and temperatures; Verdict ships no HTTP server Separate identity because the report does not establish equivalence to the newer Decision Index checkpoint or serving recipe. No latency imported.

32.1±2.0#298 of 355 decision modelsfrom 8 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The decision models ranked either side of Verdict 1.4 (JevBench mini), out of 357 with a score.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
298Kodiak v0.2 1B (accuracy) Cortex Agent LLC32±1model files
299JEV FLAN-T5 Large public v2 (342M) Elfsong32±1model files2026-10-18
300Verdict 1.4 (JevBench mini) Heman10x32±2source code
301Crivo-150M v2 tardellirs32±1model files
302Bekko System One v0 400M hotchpotch32±1model files

see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

tools & automation▁▃▁▃▁▂▃▄▆██▆ #224 of 250 * · 15% of its score · 2 tests

Beats DM-JEPA 1.1, Kodiak v0.2 1B (accuracy), JEV FLAN-T5 Large public v2 (342M) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Prumo (rule-based engine), Crivo-17M, JevK5 Lite here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
AgentDecisionBench: L1 BFCL v4 + When2Call (3,991 items)47.2% ✎█·····▄·▄▄·▄ beats 1/5easy · avg 75%▇▇▇▇ 10%at its level
AgentDecisionBench: L2 DecisionGym common states (200 tasks)19.0% ✎██···█·██··█ beats 1/5medium · avg 57%▇▇ 4.9%sharp · noisy
consistency▃·▃▂·▅▃·▃▅▃█ #19 of 21 · 38% of its score · 5 tests

Beats Laya (typed-decisions) (JevBench mini), Laya (english) (JevBench mini) here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Probability measure coherence (pass rate)19.9% ✎▄·▃·▃▃▁·▃▄▁█ beats 3/20medium · avg 43%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 21%sharp
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Representation consistency (pass rate)66.1% ✎▃·▂·▃▂▂▃▅▅▃█ beats 3/20easy · avg 79%▇▇▇▇▇ 14%at its level
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Logical coherence (pass rate)77.9% ✎▃·▃·█▅▅██▃█▅ beats 11/20easy · avg 78%▇ 2.1%blunt · at its level
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Choice-set coherence (pass rate)33.3% ✎▃▃▄█▄▄·····▄ beats 0/20easy · avg 79%▇ 1.2%at its level · noisy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Batch independence (pass rate)100.0% ✎▁··········█ beats 3/20very easy · avg 97%▇ 0.0%blunt · maxed out · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 46% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · unchanged-answer accuracy64.2% ✎▁·▃·▂···▂▂▁█ beats 2/20very easy · avg 87%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 46%sharp · at its level

$ where to run it

Implementation and setup instructions ↗
Published implementation and setup documentation verified. This entry describes a decision readout or evaluated configuration, not necessarily separate trained weights. Follow the referenced version and model settings; hardware compatibility has not been verified. Source · checked 2026-10-31.

Model repository and documentation: github.com/Heman10x-NGU ↗

$ how the score was worked out · JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluatio… 84%, AgentDecisionBench 15%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluation reports6Apache-2.0
AgentDecisionBench2CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 32.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json