whatmodel.sh / decision / Laya (english) (JevBench mini)

Laya (english) (JevBench mini) is a source-available decision implementation from Convai Innovations.

Catalogue identity notes

JevBench 0.1.0 mini tested configuration laya: Encoder, option markers; base ModernBERT-large; readout one [MASK] marker per option. Separate identity because the report does not establish equivalence to the newer Decision Index checkpoint or serving recipe. No latency imported.

32.6±2.2#295 of 355 decision modelsfrom 6 benchmark results across 1 source

$ how it compares

The decision models ranked either side of Laya (english) (JevBench mini), out of 357 with a score, then more from Convai Innovations.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
295Mola-150M codavidgarcia33±1model files2026-10-14
296DM-JEPA 1.1 Danger Labs33±1model files
297Laya (english) (JevBench mini) Convai Innovations33±2source code
298Kodiak v0.2 1B (accuracy) Cortex Agent LLC32±1model files
299JEV FLAN-T5 Large public v2 (342M) Elfsong32±1model files2026-10-18
more from Convai Innovations
291Laya (typed-decisions) (JevBench mini) Convai Innovations33±2source code

see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

consistency▃·▂▂·▅▃·▃▅▃█ #21 of 21 · 45% of its score · 5 tests

Trails Verdict 1.4 (JevBench mini) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Probability measure coherence (pass rate)16.4% ✎▄·▁·▃▃▁·▃▄▁█ beats 1/20medium · avg 43%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%sharp
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Representation consistency (pass rate)52.5% ✎▃·▂·▂▂▂▃▅▅▃█ beats 0/20easy · avg 79%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 16%at its level
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Logical coherence (pass rate)67.9% ✎▃·▃·█▅▅██▃█▅ beats 4/20easy · avg 78%▇ 2.4%blunt · at its level
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Choice-set coherence (pass rate)45.8% ✎▁▃▄█▄▄·····▄ beats 1/20easy · avg 79%▇ 1.4%at its level · noisy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Batch independence (pass rate)100.0% ✎▁··········█ beats 2/20very easy · avg 97%▇ 0.0%blunt · maxed out · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 53% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · unchanged-answer accuracy70.8% ✎▁·▂·▃···▂▂▁█ beats 3/20very easy · avg 87%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 53%sharp · at its level

$ where to run it

Implementation and setup instructions ↗
Published implementation and setup documentation verified. This entry describes a decision readout or evaluated configuration, not necessarily separate trained weights. Follow the referenced version and model settings; hardware compatibility has not been verified. Source · checked 2026-10-31.

Model repository and documentation: github.com/NandhaKishorM ↗

$ how the score was worked out · JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluatio… 98%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluation reports6Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 32.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json