whatmodel.sh / decision / Sieve-Vision-4B
Sieve-Vision-4B
↗ share
+ contribute
Sieve-Vision-4B is an open-weights decision model from Sthānika AI. Its published size is 4.54B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Exact Decision Index tested engine sieve-vision-4b; reported model Sieve-Vision-4B. Type: full fine-tune; technique: autoregressive. Comparison entry; no current run command, API price or speed inferred from the benchmark. Current repository metadata checked separately; an unpinned alias is not evidence that today’s weights reproduce this historical run.
Model information sources
· Weights licence ↗ · Parameter count ↗
Publisher parameter count; includes the served backbone, not just adapter size.
$ how it compares
The decision models ranked either side of Sieve-Vision-4B, out of 357 with a score, then more from Sthānika AI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 145 |  Amber Hybrid 4B (decision readout) | 57±1 | model files | ||
| 146 |  Solar Decide | 57±1 | api price unknown | ||
| 147 | Sieve-Vision-4B | 56±4 | model files | ||
| 148 |  xor-26b-a4b-v1.1 | 56±4 | model files | ||
| 149 |  decisio 0.4.0 (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B) (decision readout) | 56±1 | source code | ||
| more from Sthānika AI | |||||
| 3 | Sieve 31B v3 | 74±2 | model files | ||
| 37 | Sieve 27B v2 | 67±1 | model files | ||
| 79 | Sieve-Vision-27B | 63±4 | model files | ||
see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
vision▁·▃▂▃▃▇▄▄█▄▃ #46 of 79 · 95% of its score · 12 tests
Beats Clef-omni here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LiquidAI d1-3B, JPT-9B Qwen3.5-9B LoRA, Solomon v1.1 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · Mind2Web (chance-corrected points) submitted | 92.6000 points ✎ | ▁·▁▁▃▁▄▄▃▅█▃ beats 58/61 | 12% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · MMMU-Pro vision (chance-corrected points) submitted | 29.1900 points ✎ | ▁▁▅▁▄▁▄█▄▃▇▇ beats 26/61 | 11% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · Winoground (chance-corrected points) submitted | 75.5000 points ✎ | ▁·▁▁▁▁·▂▁▃▅█ beats 19/61 | 10% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4: private same skills (points) | 52.0200 points ✎ | ▁▁▃▃▁▂▄▆▃▃▅█ beats 25/61 | 10% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · Moderation (Hateful Memes) (chance-corrected points) submitted | 22.5100 points ✎ | ▆▃▃▆▄▄▇██▁▆▆ beats 12/61 | 8.8% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · RealWorldQA (chance-corrected points) submitted | 60.3200 points ✎ | ▁·▂▂▁▃▃▅▅▃▂█ beats 30/61 | 8.0% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · CharXiv (chance-corrected points) submitted | 63.1600 points ✎ | ▂▁▁▁▁▃▁▅▅▆██ beats 15/61 | 7.8% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · InfographicVQA (chance-corrected points) submitted | 92.3500 points ✎ | ▁·▁▂▁▁▃▁▂▃▅█ beats 30/61 | 6.2% |
4 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · R-Bench-M (chance-corrected points) submitted | 20.4100 points ✎ | ▂▄▇▆█▄▄▇▂··▁ beats 25/61 | 6.2% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · BLINK (chance-corrected points) submitted | 51.9900 points ✎ | ▁···▁▂▂▂█▄▂▃ beats 22/61 | 5.9% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · CV-Bench (chance-corrected points) submitted | 69.8900 points ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▁▁▃▄█▃▃ beats 17/61 | 4.7% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · KIE (CORD+FUNSD) (chance-corrected points) submitted | 89.5800 points ✎ | ▁··▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▁ beats 19/61 | 3.4% |
$ where to run it
Download model files ↗
Published model files verified. This is a verified repository snapshot; the benchmark does not establish an identical weight revision. A local run command and hardware requirements have not been verified for this entry. Source · checked 2026-10-31.
Model repository and documentation: huggingface.co/sthanika-ai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Decision Index Vision 0.4 95%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
 Decision Index Vision 0.4 · submitted; independent execution unverified | 12 | 95% |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 5% | |
| weighted average | = 55.9 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json