whatmodel.sh / video / Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B

Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B is an open-weights video model from NVIDIA, released December 2025. Its published size is 14B parameters. Licence: nvidia-open-model-license.

Catalogue identity notes

NVIDIA Cosmos-Predict2.5 14B base model, released 5 Dec 2025 (cosmos-predict2.5 README: 'Released Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B base models'); HF nvidia/Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B pinned 18839bf (NVIDIA Open Model License per card). PhyGround's 'Cosmos-14B' row is listed in its Appendix generation table as 'Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B' (93 frames, 16 fps, 1280x704); the Cosmos 3 report (NVIDIA) runs 'Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B' on Cosmos HUE. Comparison-only: no local command verified in this pass.

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗

14B as named by NVIDIA (model name). Text encoder and tokenizer not included.

46.8±2.9comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 4 benchmark results across 3 sources

$ how it compares

The video models ranked either side of Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B, out of 139 with a score, then more from NVIDIA.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
82Kandinsky 5.0 T2V Lite Sber47±2local~29GB2025-09
83LTX-2 19B Distilled Lightricks47±8api $0.020/sec +local~41GB2026-01
84Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B NVIDIA47±3comparison only2025-12
85CogVideoX-5B-I2V Zhipu AI (THUDM)46±4local~13GB2024-09
86Cosmos-1.0-Diffusion-7B-Text2World NVIDIA46±3local~30GB2025-01
more from NVIDIA
38Cosmos3-Super NVIDIA58±4local~160GB2026-05
60Cosmos3-Nano NVIDIA52±3local~42GB2026-05
72Cosmos-1.0-Diffusion-7B-Video2World NVIDIA49±5comparison only2025-01

see all video models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to video▇▅▄▆█▆▇▂▃▃▂▄ #49 of 94 * · 32% of its score · 1 test

Beats Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Cosmos-1.0-Diffusion-7B-Text2World here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Cosmos HUE human evaluation, text-to-video (Cosmos 3 report) lab82.1% ✎█▄▄··▄▄▄▄▄·▄ beats 2/9easy · avg 85%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 32%typical
image to video▁▁▂▂██▄▃▃▄▂▂ #59 of 74 * · 56% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Wan 2.2 A14B, LTX-2 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Hailuo 01 (MiniMax video-01 / I2V-01) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
CRONOS counterfactual rigid-body physics (I2V success rate)8.0% ✎█·····█··█·█ beats 1/3very hard · avg 12%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 31%sharp
Cosmos HUE human evaluation, image-to-video (Cosmos 3 report) lab83.0% ✎▄·█··▄··▄▄▄█ beats 2/8easy · avg 84%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%typical
other tests1 not in a task · 8.7% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
PhyGround physics human evaluation (Overall, TI2V)58.2% ✎█▄▄··▄···▄·█ beats 4/7medium · avg 57%▇▇▇ 8.7%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/nvidia ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Cosmos 3: Omnimodal World Mod… 57%, CRONOS: Benchmarking Counterf… 31%, PhyGround: Benchmarking Physi… 9%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Cosmos 3: Omnimodal World Models for Physical AI (arXiv:2606.02800v4) · lab-reported2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 57%CC-BY-4.0
CRONOS: Benchmarking Counterfactual Physical Consistency in Video Models (arXiv:2605.23699v1), Table 11▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 31%CC BY 4.0
PhyGround: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in Generative World Models (arXiv:2605.10806v1)1▇▇▇ 9%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 4%
weighted average= 46.8

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json