whatmodel.sh / codex-mini-latest

codex-mini-latest is a closed-weights language model from OpenAI, released May 2025. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only: retired or no longer listed API model, kept so its independent runs can be scored. OpenAI API model codex-mini-latest. OpenAI API changelog (May 15, 2025): 'Launched codex-mini-latest in the API, optimized for use with the Codex CLI'; OpenAI deprecations page (2025-11-17 notice): removal from the API on February 12, 2026. OpenAI documents no second model behind the id during its life, so the single served checkpoint is pinned by name. Distinct from gpt-5-codex / gpt-5.1-codex-mini.

60.2±4.4comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of codex-mini-latest, out of 1132 with a score, then more from OpenAI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
281DeepSeek V3 0324 DeepSeek60±1local~108GB2025-03
282Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 Alibaba60±1api $0.15/M +local~20GB2025-07
283codex-mini-latest OpenAI60±4comparison only2025-05
284Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct Alibaba60±1api $0.28/M +local~22GB2025-10
285Cogito v1 Preview Qwen 14B Deep Cogito60±7local~10GB2025-03
more from OpenAI
1GPT-6 Astra OpenAI87±1api $20.00/M2026-09
3GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI85±1api $4.00/M2026-09
7GPT-6 Sol OpenAI83±1api $4.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▂▁ #195 of 549 * · 91% of its score · 1 test

Beats Gemini 2.5 Pro, Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512, Phi-4-reasoning 14B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
WebApp1K-Duo-React pass@1 (onekq-ai)57.5% ✎▁··▁·▁▁▁▆█▇█ beats 9/45hard · avg 32%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 91%at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · WebApp1K models leaderboard (… 91%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
WebApp1K models leaderboard (onekq-ai)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 91%MIT
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇ 9%
weighted average= 60.2

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json