whatmodel.sh / BLOOM 7.1B
BLOOM 7.1B
↗ share
+ contribute
BLOOM 7.1B is an open-weights language model from BigScience, released July 2022. Its published size is 7.07B parameters and a 2k-token context window. Licence: bigscience-bloom-rail-1.0.
Catalogue identity notes
BigScience BLOOM pretrained base model (not BLOOMZ).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of BLOOM 7.1B, out of 828 with a score, then more from BigScience.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 788 | 22±1 | local | |||
| 789 | 21±1 | local | |||
| 790 | 21±1 | local | |||
| 791 | 21±2 | local | |||
| 792 | 21±4 | local | |||
| more from BigScience | |||||
| 803 | 18±1 | local | |||
| 810 | 14±1 | local | |||
| 814 | 11±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
coding█···█··█··██ #1 of 5 * · 16% of its score · 1 test
other tests18 not in a task · 84% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC Challenge | 33.5% ✎ | ▁·▁··▁▁▇▂█▆▃ beats 5/26 | 23% |
| WinoGrande | 64.6% ✎ | ▁····▁··▁▂█▄ beats 11/26 | 8.4% |
| BoolQ | 62.8% ✎ | ▂▃▂▅▆▂▅▆█▂▂▂ beats 4/26 | 7.9% |
| SciQ | 90.1% ✎ | ▁·▁·▁·▃▅▃█▄▁ beats 7/26 | 7.5% |
| ARC Easy | 57.4% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▁▄▅▄█▅▁▃ beats 4/26 | 6.9% |
| HellaSwag | 62.3% ✎ | ▃···▁▇▅█▇▃▁▁ beats 5/26 | 5.9% |
| Natural Questions (closed book) | 8.1% ✎ | ▁·▁·▁▂▁▃·▅▂█ beats 7/28 | 4.9% |
| PIQA | 72.7% ✎ | ▁·▁··▁▃▃█▅█▂ beats 3/26 | 4.3% |
10 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-word accuracy | 57.6% ✎ | ▁··▂▁▃▁▂▆█▅▃ beats 4/26 | 3.0% |
| Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (10-shot) | 18.1% ✎ | ▃▅▃··▅▃·█▃▃▅ beats 0/13 | 2.7% |
| Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (zero-shot) | 3.2% ✎ | ▅····▃▅·██·█ beats 0/13 | 2.4% |
| Social IQA | 42.1% ✎ | ▁···▁▃█▁▁▁·▁ beats 14/26 | 1.8% |
| OpenBookQA | 25.2% ✎ | █·▁▁▃·▁▃▅▇▃▄ beats 2/26 | 1.7% |
| TriviaQA | 26.3% ✎ | ▁··▁█▃▃▃▄▅▄█ beats 12/28 | 1.0% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 28.9% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 27/276 | 0.7% |
| TruthfulQA MC2 | 38.9% ✎ | ▅▃█▆▁▂▅···▁▁ beats 6/31 | 0.6% |
| COPA | 53.2% ✎ | ▅·▃·▃··█▃··▃ beats 0/8 | 0.4% |
| HaluEval QA hallucination detection (accuracy) | 58.1% ✎ | █▁▁·▁▁·▁▃▁▁▁ beats 23/27 | 0.2% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run BLOOM 7.1B · needs ~5.3 GB · from huggingface.co/mradermacherchat in the terminal
llama cli -hf mradermacher/bloom-7b1-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf mradermacher/bloom-7b1-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run BLOOM 7.1B · needs ~5.3 GB · from huggingface.co/mradermacher
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/bloom-7b1-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run BLOOM 7.1B · needs ~5.3 GB · from huggingface.co/mradermacherchat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/bloom-7b1-GGUF:Q4_K_M
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~14.14 GB · from huggingface.co/bigscience (official)
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='bigscience/bloom-7b1', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/bigscience ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Stability AI — original Stabl… 71%, BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-… 16%, Hallucinations Leaderboard re… 7% and 3 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 71% | |
| 1 | 16% | |
| 4 | 7% | |
| 2 | 5% | |
| 1 | 1% | |
| 1 | 0% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 21.0 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json