whatmodel.sh / OPT-66B
OPT-66B
↗ share
+ contribute
OPT-66B is an open-weights language model from Meta, released May 2022. Its published size is 66B parameters and a 2k-token context window. Licence: opt-175b-license-noncommercial.
Catalogue identity notes
Meta's Open Pre-trained Transformer base model as released on Hugging Face (weights under Meta's non-commercial OPT licence).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of OPT-66B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Meta.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 734 | 31±1 | local | |||
| 735 | 31±1 | local | |||
| 736 | 31±1 | local | |||
| 737 | 30±2 | local | |||
| 738 | 30±1 | local | |||
| more from Meta | |||||
| 24 | 77±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 40 | 75±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 43 | 75±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
$ what it's good at
other tests7 not in a task · 99% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC Challenge | 37.2% ✎ | █··▁·▁▁·▁▂▁▃ beats 19/19 | 32% |
| WinoGrande | 68.7% ✎ | ▄····▄▆▂▄▆▆█ beats 19/19 | 22% |
| ARC Easy | 71.7% ✎ | ▃·▅▃▃▅·██▃██ beats 19/19 | 18% |
| PIQA | 78.8% ✎ | ▂·▄▄·▄▂▆▂▄█▄ beats 19/19 | 10% |
| SciQ | 92.6% ✎ | ▂··▂▃▂▂▆▃▃█▃ beats 19/19 | 7.6% |
| LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-word accuracy | 73.9% ✎ | ▃··▅▃▃▅▅▅███ beats 19/19 | 7.1% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 35.0% ✎ | ▃▁▁▃▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 41/276 | 2.6% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~132.37 GB · from huggingface.co/facebook
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='facebook/opt-66b', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/facebook ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing… 97%, Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboa… 3%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 97% | |
| 1 | 3% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 30.5 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json