whatmodel.sh / Tulu 2 DPO 7B
Tulu 2 DPO 7B
↗ share
+ contribute
Tulu 2 DPO 7B is an open-weights language model from Allen Institute for AI, released November 2023. Its published size is 7B parameters. Licence: AI2 ImpACT Low-risk; Llama 2 base terms.
Catalogue identity notes
Exact full-precision model evaluated in the Tulu 2 paper (arXiv:2311.10702v2). QLoRA ablations are separate and not imported.
Model information sources
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Tulu 2 DPO 7B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Allen Institute for AI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 693 | 35±2 | comparison only | |||
| 694 | 35±1 | local | |||
| 695 | 35±1 | local | |||
| 696 | 35±3 | local | |||
| 697 | 35±1 | local | |||
| more from Allen Institute for AI | |||||
| 493 | 46±1 | local | |||
| 516 | 46±2 | local | |||
| 557 | 44±2 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
coding▁▁▃▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #441 of 458 * · 15% of its score · 1 test
Beats Molmo 7B-D (0924), DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, Tulu 2 7B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Falcon3 1B Instruct, Granite 3.0 1B-A400M Instruct, Gemma 1.1 2B IT here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tulu 2: CodexEval pass@10 lab | 40.0% ✎ | ▃▃▃·▆▃▃█▃▂▂▅ beats 5/25 | 15% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #362 of 393 * · 38% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct, Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct (Apr 2024) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct, Granite 4.0 350M here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 9.2% ✎ | ▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 20/122 | 30% |
| AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge) | 84.2% ✎ | ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 22/45 | 7.9% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #347 of 398 * · 8.3% of its score · 1 test
Beats Command R Plus (04-2024), Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct (June 2024 update), Yi 34B Chat here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3 0.6B here, though they rank lower overall.
other tests4 not in a task · 38% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard lab | 45.5% ✎ | ▁·····▂█▂▅·▁ beats 6/25 | 23% |
| MMLU lab | 50.7% ✎ | ▁▁▃▃▄█▄▁█··▁ beats 10/25 | 8.7% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 63.9% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 106/276 | 3.3% |
| Tulu 2: TyDiQA gold passage, 1-shot F1 lab | 44.5% ✎ | ▂··▁▃▂▃▂█▅▁▂ beats 9/25 | 3.1% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Tulu 2 DPO 7B · needs ~4.1 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBlokechat in the terminal
llama cli -hf TheBloke/tulu-2-dpo-7B-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf TheBloke/tulu-2-dpo-7B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Tulu 2 DPO 7B · needs ~4.1 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBloke
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/tulu-2-dpo-7B-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Tulu 2 DPO 7B · needs ~4.1 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBlokechat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/TheBloke/tulu-2-dpo-7B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~13.48 GB · from huggingface.co/allenai
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='allenai/tulu-2-dpo-7b', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/allenai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Tulu 2 — base and instruction… 58%, AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 38%, Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboa… 3%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 58% | |
| 2 | 38% | |
| 1 | 3% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 35.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json