whatmodel.sh / Starling-LM 7B alpha
Starling-LM 7B alpha
↗ share
+ contribute
Starling-LM 7B alpha is an open-weights language model from UC Berkeley (NEST), released November 2023. Its published size is 7.24B parameters and a 8k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Arena entry 'starling-lm-7b-alpha' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'starling-lm-7b-alpha' as 'Starling-LM-7B-alpha' (UC Berkeley, CC-BY-NC-4.0), linking https://huggingface.co/berkeley-nest/Starling-LM-7B-alpha. Maker repo berkeley-nest/Starling-LM-7B-alpha @1dddf3b: licence tag apache-2.0. 7,241,748,480 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2023-11: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-11-25). Card: 'Apache-2.0 license under the condition that the model is not used to compete with OpenAI'; also described as a non-commercial research preview (the Arena licence field says CC-BY-NC-4.0).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Starling-LM 7B alpha, out of 828 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 635 | 39±1 | local | |
| 636 | 39±1 | local | |
| 637 | 39±1 | local | |
| 638 | 39±1 | local | |
| 639 | 39±1 | local |
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #337 of 393 · 60% of its score · 4 tests
Beats OpenThinker3 7B, Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Granite 4.0 H 350M, LFM2 350M, Gemma 3 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 14.7% ✎ | ▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 37/122 | 25% |
| Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judge) | 12.8% ✎ | ▂▁▁▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 7/60 | 14% |
| Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024) | 1099.0 ✎ | ▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 44/95 | 11% |
| LMArena (text) | 1167.4 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 48/379 | 11% |
other tests7 not in a task · 39% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Questions (closed book) | 28.2% ✎ | ▁·▁·▁▂▁▂·▅▂█ beats 25/28 | 19% |
| CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 judge scale) | 52.6% ✎ | ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆▅▄▂▃ beats 18/95 | 8.0% |
| Polish EQ-Bench v2 (SpeakLeash) | 46.3% ✎ | ▁··▁▁▂▂▆▅▆█▆ beats 19/70 | 6.0% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 69.6% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 162/276 | 2.2% |
| TriviaQA | 66.0% ✎ | ▁··▁█▃▃▁▄▅▄█ beats 26/28 | 1.9% |
| HaluEval QA hallucination detection (accuracy) | 59.7% ✎ | █▁▁·▁▁·▁▁▃▁▁ beats 24/27 | 1.6% |
| TruthfulQA MC2 | 47.3% ✎ | ▅▃█▆▃▂▅···▁▁ beats 22/31 | 0.9% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Starling-LM 7B alpha · needs ~4.4 GB · from huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahichat in the terminal
llama cli -hf MaziyarPanahi/Starling-LM-7B-alpha-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf MaziyarPanahi/Starling-LM-7B-alpha-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Starling-LM 7B alpha · needs ~4.4 GB · from huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi/Starling-LM-7B-alpha-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Starling-LM 7B alpha · needs ~4.84 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run starling-lm:7b-alpha-q4_K_M
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/berkeley-nest ↗
$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 25%, Hallucinations Leaderboard re… 23%, Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderbo… 14% and 5 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25% | |
| 4 | 23% | |
| 1 | 14% | |
| 1 | 11% | |
| 1 | 11% | |
| 1 | 8% | |
| 1 | 6% | |
| 1 | 2% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 38.9 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json