whatmodel.sh / image / Stable Diffusion v2.1
Stable Diffusion v2.1
↗ share
+ contribute
Stable Diffusion v2.1 is an open-weights image model from Stability AI, released December 2022.
Model information sources
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of Stable Diffusion v2.1, out of 197 with a score, then more from Stability AI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178 | 30±3 | local | |||
| 179 | 30±4 | comparison only | |||
| 180 | 29±2 | comparison only | |||
| 181 | 29±3 | comparison only | |||
| 182 | 29±4 | local | |||
| more from Stability AI | |||||
| 137 | 42±1 | api $0.065/image +local | |||
| 141 | 41±3 | api $0.035/image +local | |||
| 148 | 40±6 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
text to image▁▂▇▇▆▅█▇▂▃▁▁ #147 of 157 · 80% of its score · 6 tests
Trails CogView2, DALL·E Mega (minDALL-E), Versatile Diffusion v1.0 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EvalMuse-40K model ranking (FGA-BLIP2 overall alignment) | 2.42 / 5 ✎ | █▄·▄██▄▄█▄▄▄ beats 2/14 | 20% |
| GenEval | 50.0% ✎ | ▅█···▅▃▃▃··▃ beats 5/10 | 20% |
| ConceptMix (k=2 full-mark score) | 29.0% ✎ | ▄·▄·█▄▄▄···▄ beats 1/7 | 15% |
| TIFA v1.0 (overall, mPLUG VQA) | 82.0% ✎ | █·······▄▄▄▄ beats 5/5 | 13% |
| GeckoNum Task 1: exact number generation (human-annotated) | 25.8% ✎ | ██·█·······█ beats 2/3 | 7.4% |
| WISE (WiScore overall, GPT-4o judge) | 32.0% ✎ | ▄·▆▂▆█▄▆▂▄·▄ beats 3/22 | 5.3% |
other tests1 not in a task · 19% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EvalAlign human text-image alignment score | 4.8000 mean human alignment score ✎ | █▄▄·█·▄█▄▄·▄ beats 4/11 | 19% |
$ where to run it
No verified API or download recorded yet · add one
$ how the score was worked out · EvalMuse-40K: A Reliable and… 20%, GenEval authors' results: djg… 20%, EvalAlign: Supervised Fine-Tu… 19% and 4 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json