whatmodel.sh / image / Stable Diffusion v1.1
Stable Diffusion v1.1
↗ share
+ contribute
Stable Diffusion v1.1 is an open-weights image model from CompVis, released August 2022. Its published size is 0.86B parameters. Licence: creativeml-openrail-m.
Catalogue identity notes
CompVis/stable-diffusion-v1-1 checkpoint. params_b = 860M UNet (github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion README); memory is the site's params x 2 bytes x 1.2 + 0.5 estimate.
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of Stable Diffusion v1.1, out of 197 with a score, then more from CompVis.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 186 | 27±2 | local | |||
| 187 | 27±4 | local | |||
| 188 | 26±3 | local | |||
| 189 | 26±3 | local | |||
| 190 | 26±11 | comparison only | |||
| more from CompVis | |||||
| 106 | 48±15 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
text to image▃▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #123 of 126 · 97% of its score · 3 tests
Trails CogView2 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenEval | 41.0% ✎ | ▅█···▅▃▃▃··▃ beats 0/10 | 53% |
| TIFA v1.0 (overall, mPLUG VQA) | 75.7% ✎ | █·······▄▄▄▄ beats 2/5 | 40% |
| REAL realism benchmark for T2I (average of attribute, relationship and style scores) | 52.7% ✎ | █··········▄ beats 1/2 | 4.1% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
version
- Run it as published · needs ~2.6 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/CompVis (official)
uv run --with diffusers --with transformers --with accelerate --with torch python -c "import torch; from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline; p=StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('CompVis/stable-diffusion-v1-1', torch_dtype=torch.float16).to('cuda'); p('a cat holding a sign').images[0].save('out.png')"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/CompVis ↗
$ how the score was worked out · GenEval authors' results: djg… 53%, TIFA: Accurate and Interpreta… 40%, REAL: Realism Evaluation of T… 4%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53% | |
| 1 | 40% | |
| 1 | 4% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 3% | |
| weighted average | = 25.8 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json