whatmodel.sh / image / Runway Gen-4 Image
Runway Gen-4 Image
↗ share
+ contribute
Runway Gen-4 Image is a closed-weights image model from Runway.
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of Runway Gen-4 Image, out of 197 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | 50±2 | api $0.015/image +local | |
| 103 | 50±5 | comparison only | |
| 104 | 50±3 | api $0.050/image | |
| 105 | 49±3 | api $0.017/image | |
| 106 | 48±15 | local |
$ what it's good at
text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #69 of 126 * · 97% of its score · 1 test
Beats Recraft V3, GLM-Image here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena text-to-image | 1024.2 ✎ | ▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 11/75 | 97% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · $0.050/image · docs.dev.runwayml.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per generated 720p image: Runway lists gen4_image at 5 credits per 720p image (8 credits, $0.08, per 1080p image); credits cost $0.01 each. Product: Runway developer API image generation. API model: gen4_image (not gen4_image_turbo, 2 credits). Settings: 720p, one image. Price basis: 5 credits × $0.01 per credit; sales tax excluded. Currency: USD. Runway official API pricing page, observed 2026-09-26.
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 97%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 97% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 3% | |
| weighted average | = 49.6 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json