whatmodel.sh / PlatoLM-7B
PlatoLM-7B
↗ share
+ contribute
PlatoLM-7B is an open-weights language model from FreedomIntelligence (CUHK-SZ), released August 2023. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Maker repo FreedomIntelligence/PlatoLM-7B @e0fdb73 (requested as FreedomIntelligence/PlatoLM-7b, which the HF API redirects to FreedomIntelligence/PlatoLM-7B): licence tag apache-2.0. Released 2023-08: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-08-21).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of PlatoLM-7B, out of 1132 with a score, then more from FreedomIntelligence (CUHK-SZ).
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 962 | 36±1 | local | |||
| 963 | 36±3 | local | |||
| 964 | 36±2 | local | |||
| 965 | 36±0 | local | |||
| 966 | 36±1 | local | |||
| more from FreedomIntelligence (CUHK-SZ) | |||||
| 318 | 59±4 | local | |||
| 432 | 55±4 | local | |||
| 522 | 52±5 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▁▄▆▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #427 of 466 * · 98% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct, Phi-2 (2.7B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct, Granite 4.0 350M here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 10.5% ✎ | ▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 25/122 | 79% |
| AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge) | 81.9% ✎ | ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 20/45 | 19% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~26.95 GB · from huggingface.co/FreedomIntelligence (official)
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='FreedomIntelligence/PlatoLM-7B', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/FreedomIntelligence ↗
$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 98%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 98% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 35.6 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json