whatmodel.sh / video / Pika 1.0

Pika 1.0

+ contribute
Update model informationAdd a place to run itAdd a test resultPropose a benchmarkCorrect a benchmark scoreEdit data on GitHub

Pika 1.0 is a closed-weights video model from Pika, released November 2023. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Pika 1.0 launched 28 Nov 2023 (TechCrunch); superseded by Pika 1.5 (Oct 2024). Rows are from evaluations dated no later than June 2024.

32.0±3.0comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 3 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The video models ranked either side of Pika 1.0, out of 139 with a score, then more from Pika.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
118VideoCrafter2 Tencent AI Lab34±2local~9.4GB2024-01
119Cosmos-1.0-Autoregressive-4B NVIDIA34±5comparison only2025-01
120Pika 1.0 Pika32±3comparison only2023-11
121Open-Sora 1.1 HPC-AI Tech32±7local~14GB2024-04
122LaVie (base T2V) Shanghai AI Lab (Vchitect)32±2local~4.9GB2023-09
more from Pika
115Pika 2.2 Pika36±2api $0.040/sec2025-02
132PikaLab (September 2023) Pika27±2comparison only2023-09

see all video models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to video▇▅▄▆█▆▇▂▃▃▂▄ #78 of 94 · 96% of its score · 3 tests

Trails LTX-Video 0.9 (2B), LaVie (base T2V) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
VideoPhy (human, SA=1 & PC=1)19.7% ✎▄▄▄·▄▄█····▄ beats 6/7medium · avg 48%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 60%sharp
VideoPhy (auto-evaluator average)29.0% ✎▅·▃▅··▃█···▃ beats 1/9medium · avg 56%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%at its level
ChronoMagic-Bench-150 GPT4o-MTScore (time-lapse metamorphosis)49.6% ✎▄·▄█▄▄▄·▄·▄█ beats 1/10medium · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 16%at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · VideoPhy / VideoPhy-2 officia… 80%, ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmar… 16%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
VideoPhy / VideoPhy-2 official repository leaderboards2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 80%MIT
ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmark for Metamorphic Evaluation of Text-to-Time-lapse Video Generation1▇▇▇▇▇ 16%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 4%
weighted average= 32.0

$ improve this page

Update model informationAdd a place to run itAdd a test resultPropose a benchmarkCorrect a benchmark scoreEdit data on GitHub

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json