whatmodel.sh / tts / Parler-TTS Mini v1
Parler-TTS Mini v1
↗ share
+ contribute
Parler-TTS Mini v1 is an open-weights text-to-speech model from Hugging Face (Parler-TTS), released August 2024. Its published size is 0.88B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
parler-tts/parler-tts-mini-v1 (description-prompted TTS; 877,842,290 parameters per HF safetensors metadata). Distinct from Parler-TTS Mini v0.1, Mini v1.1 and Large v1.
Score within the Vapi Humanness · Bradley–Terry rating, 2026-09-25 snapshot comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The text-to-speech models ranked either side of Parler-TTS Mini v1, out of 148 with a score, then more from Hugging Face (Parler-TTS).
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | GPT-SoVITS v2 | 44±4 | local | ||
| 103 | 44±5 | local | |||
| 104 | 44±6 | local | |||
| 105 | 42±3 | comparison only | |||
| 106 | Nabra-82M v0.1 | 42±10 | local | ||
| more from Hugging Face (Parler-TTS) | |||||
| 87 | 49±14 | local | |||
| 133 | 29±3 | local | |||
see all text-to-speech models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
other tests2 not in a task · 85% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| VERSA TTS demo · LibriSpeech test-clean UTMOS | 3.83 / 5 ✎ | ▄·····▄·▄█·▄ beats 4/5 | 82% |
| VERSA TTS demo · LibriSpeech test-clean Whisper WER | 4.7% ✎ | ▄··········█ beats 3/5 | 2.6% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~3.51 GB · from huggingface.co/parler-tts
pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/parler-tts.git soundfile && python -c "import torch, soundfile as sf; from parler_tts import ParlerTTSForConditionalGeneration; from transformers import AutoTokenizer; d = 'cuda:0' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu'; m = ParlerTTSForConditionalGeneration.from_pretrained('parler-tts/parler-tts-mini-v1').to(d); t = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('parler-tts/parler-tts-mini-v1'); desc = 'A female speaker delivers a slightly expressive and animated speech with a moderate speed and pitch. The recording is of very high quality, with the speaker voice sounding clear and very close up.'; g = m.generate(input_ids=t(desc, return_tensors='pt').input_ids.to(d), prompt_input_ids=t('Hey, how are you doing today?', return_tensors='pt').input_ids.to(d)); sf.write('parler_tts_out.wav', g.cpu().numpy().squeeze(), m.config.sampling_rate)"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/parler-tts ↗
$ how the score was worked out · VERSA toolkit paper: TTS demo… 85%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 85% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 15% | |
| weighted average | = 43.9 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json