whatmodel.sh / OPT-13B (13 billion parameters)

OPT-13B (13 billion parameters) is an open-weights language model from Meta, released May 2022. Its published size is 13B parameters and a 2k-token context window. Licence: opt-175b-license-noncommercial.

Catalogue identity notes

Meta's Open Pre-trained Transformer base model as released on Hugging Face (weights under Meta's non-commercial OPT licence).

26.1±1.3#668 of 719 LLMsfrom 11 benchmark results across 3 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of OPT-13B (13 billion parameters), out of 828 with a score, then more from Meta.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
769GPT-3 text-davinci-001 OpenAI26±3comparison only2022-01
770GPT4All-13B-Snoozy Nomic AI26±2local~56GB2023-04
771OPT-13B (13 billion parameters) Meta26±1local~29GB2022-05
772Granite 4.0 350M IBM26±1local~1.7GB2025-10
773GPT-3 curie (API base model) OpenAI26±1comparison only2020-06
more from Meta
24Muse Spark 1.3 Meta77±1api $2.00/M2026-09
40Muse Spark 1.2 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-08
43Muse Spark 1.1 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-07

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

other tests11 not in a task · 99% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ARC Challenge32.9% ✎█··▁·▁▁·▁▂▃▂ beats 17/19medium · avg 72%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%sharp
WinoGrande65.2% ✎▄····▄▆▂▄▆▆█ beats 16/19easy · avg 89%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 17%at its level
ARC Easy67.1% ✎▃·▅▃▃▅·██▃██ beats 15/19very easy · avg 90%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 17%at its level
Natural Questions (closed book)13.5% ✎▁·▁·▁▂▁▂·▅▂█ beats 10/28medium · avg 58%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%typical
PIQA76.0% ✎▂·▄▄·▄▂▆▂▄█▄ beats 15/19easy · avg 88%▇▇▇▇ 9.4%blunt · at its level
SciQ90.8% ✎▂··▂▃▂▂▆▃▃█▂ beats 17/19very easy · avg 98%▇▇▇ 8.5%typical
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-word accuracy68.6% ✎▃··▅▃▃▅▅▅███ beats 16/19very easy · avg 89%▇▇▇ 7.0%blunt · at its level
TriviaQA41.0% ✎▁··▁█▃▃▁▄▅▄█ beats 16/28easy · avg 79%▇ 2.3%at its level · noisy
3 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks)28.2% ✎▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 15/276medium · avg 73%▇ 1.9%noisy
TruthfulQA MC234.0% ✎▅▃█▆▁▂▅···▁▁ beats 1/31medium · avg 64%▇ 1.2%blunt · at its level
HaluEval QA hallucination detection (accuracy)35.3% ✎█▁▁·▁▁·▁▁▁▁▁ beats 8/27medium · avg 70%▇ 0.7%sharp · too hard for it · noisy

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~25.71 GB · from huggingface.co/facebook
    uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='facebook/opt-13b', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/facebook ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing… 79%, Hallucinations Leaderboard re… 18%, Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboa… 2%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling — authors' own runs6▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 79%CC BY-SA 4.0
Hallucinations Leaderboard results (HF dataset hallucinations-leaderboard/results)4▇▇▇▇▇ 18%Apache-2.0
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard (archived)1▇ 2%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 26.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json