whatmodel.sh / stt / Omnilingual ASR CTC 300M v2
Omnilingual ASR CTC 300M v2
↗ share
+ contribute
Omnilingual ASR CTC 300M v2 is an open-weights speech-to-text model from Meta, released December 2025. Its published size is 0.33B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Omnilingual ASR model card 'omniASR_CTC_300M_v2' (checkpoint https://dl.fbaipublicfiles.com/mms/omniASR-CTC-300M-v2.pt, listed in src/omnilingual_asr/cards/models/rc_models_v2.yaml @ 81f51e2; 'December 2025 Update'). Not on Hugging Face; the CSV entry 'facebook/omniASR-CTC-300M-v2' is the leaderboard's label. Distinct from the v1 checkpoint of the same size. Params: README table. Needs libsndfile (README).
Score within the Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The speech-to-text models ranked either side of Omnilingual ASR CTC 300M v2, out of 176 with a score, then more from Meta.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 141 | 44±3 | local | |||
| 142 | 43±2 | local | |||
| 143 | 43±3 | local | |||
| 144 | 43±3 | local | |||
| 145 | 43±4 | local | |||
| more from Meta | |||||
| 1 | 71±3 | api $0.0030/audio min | |||
| 58 | 58±2 | local | |||
| 59 | 58±3 | local | |||
see all speech-to-text models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
multilingual transcription▃··▃▄█▆▅▄▂·▂ #35 of 36 * · 97% of its score · 1 test
Beats Omnilingual ASR CTC 300M here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open ASR multilingual WER | 14.3% ✎ | ▃··▂▃▂█▃█▂▁▁ beats 1/29 | 97% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~1.29 GB · from github.com/facebookresearch (official)
uv run --python 3.12 --with omnilingual-asr python -c "from omnilingual_asr.models.inference.pipeline import ASRInferencePipeline as P; print(P(model_card='omniASR_CTC_300M_v2').transcribe(['audio.wav'], batch_size=1))"
Official weights and documentation: github.com/facebookresearch ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Open ASR Leaderboard 97%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 97% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 3% | |
| weighted average | = 42.8 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json