whatmodel.sh / OpenAssistant Pythia 12B SFT v8 (7k steps)
OpenAssistant Pythia 12B SFT v8 (7k steps)
↗ share
+ contribute
OpenAssistant Pythia 12B SFT v8 (7k steps) is an open-weights language model from LAION (OpenAssistant), released May 2023. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Maker repo OpenAssistant/pythia-12b-sft-v8-7k-steps @275c9b7: licence tag apache-2.0. Released 2023-05: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-05-07).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of OpenAssistant Pythia 12B SFT v8 (7k steps), out of 1132 with a score, then more from LAION (OpenAssistant).
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1065 | 26±2 | local | |||
| 1066 | 26±1 | local | |||
| 1067 | 26±3 | local | |||
| 1068 | 26±1 | local | |||
| 1069 | 26±1 | comparison only | |||
| more from LAION (OpenAssistant) | |||||
| 1087 | 22±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▃▁▄▆▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #458 of 466 * · 97% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Phi-2 (2.7B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct, Falcon 7B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 4.2% ✎ | ▁▃▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 4/122 | 53% |
| AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge) | 41.9% ✎ | ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 4/45 | 43% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~23.84 GB · from huggingface.co/OpenAssistant
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='OpenAssistant/pythia-12b-sft-v8-7k-steps', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/OpenAssistant ↗
$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 97%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 97% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 3% | |
| weighted average | = 26.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json