whatmodel.sh / MAP-Neo 7B Instruct v0.1 ExPO

MAP-Neo 7B Instruct v0.1 ExPO is an open-weights language model from Chujie Zheng (ExPO), released May 2024. Its published size is 7.79B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Maker repo chujiezheng/neo_7b_instruct_v0.1-ExPO @2b42768: licence tag apache-2.0. 7,793,716,224 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2024-05: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2024-05-30).

37.7±3.1#759 of 949 LLMsfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of MAP-Neo 7B Instruct v0.1 ExPO, out of 1132 with a score, then more from Chujie Zheng (ExPO).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
922zephyr-7b-beta-ExPO Chujie Zheng (ExPO)38±2local~6.1GB2024-04
923Qwen3.5 0.8B Alibaba38±1local~2GB2026-03
924MAP-Neo 7B Instruct v0.1 ExPO Chujie Zheng (ExPO)38±3local~18GB2024-05
925Sarvam-M Sarvam AI38±5local~16GB2025-05
926Code Tulu 2 7B Allen Institute for AI38±2local~16GB2023-11
more from Chujie Zheng (ExPO)
548Llama-3-Instruct-8B-SimPO-ExPO Chujie Zheng (ExPO)51±1local~6.6GB2024-05
660Mistral7B-PairRM-SPPO-ExPO Chujie Zheng (ExPO)47±2local~6.1GB2024-05
730internlm2-chat-20b-ExPO Chujie Zheng (ExPO)45±2local~14GB2024-05

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

other tests1 not in a task · 96% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
WildBench v2 WB-Score (task macro)23.1142 WB-Score ✎▁·▁▁·▃█▄▇▆▅▆ beats 4/52avg 45.199 WB-Score▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 96%sharp

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~15.59 GB · from huggingface.co/chujiezheng (official)
    uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='chujiezheng/neo_7b_instruct_v0.1-ExPO', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/chujiezheng ↗

$ how the score was worked out · WildBench v2 leaderboard data… 96%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
WildBench v2 leaderboard data (Ai2)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 96%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 4%
weighted average= 37.7

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json