whatmodel.sh / image / Lucid Origin
Lucid Origin
↗ share
+ contribute
Lucid Origin is a closed-weights image model from Leonardo.Ai, released August 2025.
Model information sources
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of Lucid Origin, out of 197 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 103 | 50±5 | comparison only | |
| 104 | 50±3 | api $0.050/image | |
| 105 | 49±3 | api $0.017/image | |
| 106 | 48±15 | local | |
| 107 | 48±11 | local |
$ what it's good at
text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #73 of 126 * · 97% of its score · 1 test
Trails Kandinsky 3 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena text-to-image | 1013.0 ✎ | ▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 7/75 | 97% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Replicate · $0.017/image · replicate.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per output image, Standard generation mode, on Replicate's official model leonardoai/lucid-origin (billing table: Standard $0.0167 per output image, Ultra $0.0765 per output image; generation_mode defaults to standard; no hardware-time charge). Product: Replicate model API (Leonardo.Ai's Lucid Origin). API model: leonardoai/lucid-origin. Settings: generation_mode=standard, default aspect ratio 16:9, one image. Price basis: published per-output-image list rate. Leonardo's own API bills from a USD balance but its per-image rates are only in the logged-in pricing calculator (leonardo.ai pricing pages return a Cloudflare challenge). Currency: USD. Not a Leonardo.Ai direct tariff. Replicate official model page, observed 2026-09-26.
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 97%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 97% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 3% | |
| weighted average | = 48.5 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json