whatmodel.sh / LLaVA-v1.6-34B

LLaVA-v1.6-34B is an open-weights language model from LLaVA, released January 2024. Its published size is 34.8B parameters and a 4k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Arena entry 'llava-v1.6-34b' (vision). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'llava-v1.6-34b' as 'LLaVA-v1.6-34B' (LLaVA, Apache 2.0), linking https://llava-vl.github.io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/. Maker repo liuhaotian/llava-v1.6-34b @6754aa8: licence tag apache-2.0. 34,751,166,464 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2024-01: LLaVA-NeXT blog post llava-vl.github.io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/ (linked by LMArena's table).

39.5±1.6#537 of 719 LLMsfrom 8 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of LLaVA-v1.6-34B, out of 828 with a score.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
627LFM2 1.2B Liquid AI40±2local~2.2GB2025-07
628Code Tulu 2 13B Allen Institute for AI40±2local~29GB2023-11
629LLaVA-v1.6-34B LLaVA40±2local~24GB2024-01
630Bielik 1.5B v3.0 Instruct SpeakLeash40±3local~2.4GB2025-04
631OpenHermes 2.5 Mistral 7B Nous Research39±1local~6.1GB2023-10

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

vision & documents▁▃▃▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█▄ #143 of 147 · 99% of its score · 8 tests

Beats Gemma 3 4B, Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3.5 0.8B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
CharXiv descriptive questions51.0% ✎▄█▄▄▄·██·▄·█ beats 0/12easy · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 31%at its level
CharXiv descriptive questions (test split)51.5% ✎█··▄··█··▄·▄ beats 0/6easy · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%at its level
Arena vision (style controlled)964.4 ✎▁▁▃▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 5/145avg 1068▇▇▇▇▇▇ 16%blunt
CapArena-Auto detailed image captioning (Score_Avg, GPT-4o judge)-67.5000 ✎▃▃▃·▃█·▅▃▃▃▃ beats 0/12avg -0.671▇▇▇▇ 11%typical
CharXiv (reasoning questions)22.5% ✎▃▂▂█▃▂·▂▂··▂ beats 0/13medium · avg 36%▇▇▇▇ 10%typical
MMMU (val) lab51.1% ✎▁····▁▁▄█▇▆▆ beats 10/52medium · avg 59%▇▇▇ 6.8%at its level · small run
CharXiv reasoning questions (test split)20.0% ✎▄··▄▄▄█····▄ beats 0/6hard · avg 32%▇▇ 6.0%blunt
TextVQA lab69.5% ✎▁▁▁▄▅▁▃·▃▃▃█ beats 6/24easy · avg 77%▇ 0.9%blunt · at its level · small run

$ where to run it

Ollama · recommended

version

  1. Install Ollama

    download it (macOS / Windows) ↗

    Linux
    curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
  2. Run LLaVA-v1.6-34B · needs ~21.38 GB · from ollama.com
    chat in the terminal
    ollama run llava:34b-v1.6-q4_K_M

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/liuhaotian ↗

$ how the score was worked out · CharXiv leaderboard (princeto… 42%, CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Rea… 24%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 16% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json