whatmodel.sh / Llama 2 70B Chat
Llama 2 70B Chat
↗ share
+ contribute
Llama 2 70B Chat is an open-weights language model from Meta, released July 2023. Its published size is 68.98B parameters and a 4k-token context window. Licence: llama2.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2023-07-18). Chat checkpoint; Epoch label 'Llama-2-70b-chat-hf' is the Hugging Face-format release of the same weights. 68,976,653,312 parameters (safetensors metadata).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Llama 2 70B Chat, out of 828 with a score, then more from Meta.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 642 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 643 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 644 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 645 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 646 | 39±1 | local | |||
| more from Meta | |||||
| 24 | 77±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 40 | 75±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 43 | 75±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
$ what it's good at
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #421 of 458 * · 4.3% of its score · 1 test
Beats DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B, Qwen3.5 2B, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tulu 2: CodexEval pass@10 | 52.1% ✎ | ▃▃▃·▆▃▃█▃▂▂▅ beats 8/25 | 4.3% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #335 of 393 · 39% of its score · 7 tests
Beats OpenThinker3 7B, Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Granite 4.0 H 350M, LFM2 350M, Gemma 3 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 14.7% ✎ | ▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 36/122 | 12% |
| Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judge) | 11.6% ✎ | ▂▁▃▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 5/60 | 6.8% |
| Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024) | 1108.0 ✎ | ▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 51/95 | 5.4% |
| LMArena (text) | 1170.6 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 49/379 | 5.3% |
| MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs) | 6.8600 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎ | ▆▂▂▆▆▄██▂▄▄▆ beats 20/28 | 4.7% |
| Arabic IFEval prompt-level (Inception) | 3.0% ✎ | ▁·▁▃▂▁▄▄▆▄█▄ beats 2/38 | 3.0% |
| AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge) | 92.7% ✎ | ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 35/45 | 1.9% |
math▁▃▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #374 of 398 · 8.9% of its score · 3 tests
Beats Command R (03-2024), Molmo 7B-D (0924), Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 2B (base), SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct, LFM2 350M here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K +1 | 59.0% ✎ | ▆▂▅█▅▅▃▆···▂ beats 19/25 | 6.3% |
| MATH level 5 | 3.3% ✎ | ▃▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 0/92 | 2.4% |
| OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 | 0.0% ✎ | ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 1/193 | 0.2% |
other tests14 not in a task · 47% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard +1 | 49.0% ✎ | ▁·····▂█▂▅·▁ beats 10/25 | 14% |
| MMLU +1 | 60.9% ✎ | ▁▁▃▃▄█▄▃█··▁ beats 18/25 | 6.1% |
| WildBench v2 WB-Score (task macro) | 20.6596 WB-Score ✎ | ▁·▁▁·▃█▄▇▆▅▆ beats 3/52 | 6.1% |
| ARC Challenge | 67.7% ✎ | ▆▁▁▂▂▅▇█▄▃▃▂ beats 78/97 | 4.4% |
| AGIEval English | 46.7% ✎ | █▄▄··▄··▄█·█ beats 2/9 | 2.7% |
| EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper run) | 51.6% ✎ | ▂··▄·▂▆▄▂█·▂ beats 12/14 | 2.4% |
| Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 average (21 tasks) | 32.6% ✎ | ▃▄▂▃█▄▃▆▃▅▂▂ beats 3/81 | 2.3% |
| BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot average (87 tasks) | 25.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▄▆█▃ beats 18/97 | 2.1% |
6 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% ✎ | ▁▃▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 7/208 | 1.9% |
| ARC Easy | 82.2% ✎ | ▁▂▃▂▃▅▇█▇▆▄▆ beats 64/65 | 1.3% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 65.7% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 118/276 | 1.1% |
| Tulu 2: TyDiQA gold passage, 1-shot F1 | 44.4% ✎ | ▂··▁▃▂▃▂█▅▁▂ beats 8/25 | 1.0% |
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 57.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▃▄█▄▃ beats 29/146 | 0.8% |
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 94.1% ✎ | ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 51/140 | 0.5% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Llama 2 70B Chat · needs ~41.4 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBlokechat in the terminal
llama cli -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Llama 2 70B Chat · needs ~41.4 GB · from huggingface.co/TheBloke
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Llama 2 70B Chat · needs ~41.89 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run llama2:70b-chat
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/meta-llama ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Orca 2: Teaching Small Langua… 21%, Tulu 2 — base and instruction… 19%, AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 14% and 13 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json