whatmodel.sh / LLaMA 13B

LLaMA 13B is an open-weights language model from Meta, released February 2023. Its published size is 13B parameters. Licence: llama-1-noncommercial-research.

Catalogue identity notes

Original LLaMA (v1) base model (Touvron et al. 2023), released by Meta to approved researchers under a non-commercial licence; no official public download exists, so no run command is listed (community re-uploads such as huggyllama/* are unofficial).

27.8±1.0comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 21 benchmark results across 6 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of LLaMA 13B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Meta.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
755Falcon 40B Instruct TII28±2local~27GB2023-05
756GPT-NeoX-20B EleutherAI28±1local~14GB2022-02
757LLaMA 13B Meta28±1comparison only2023-02
758Koala 13B UC Berkeley (BAIR)28±1comparison only2023-04
759StarCoderBase 3B BigCode28±1local~3.4GB2023-06
more from Meta
24Muse Spark 1.3 Meta77±1api $2.00/M2026-09
40Muse Spark 1.2 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-08
43Muse Spark 1.1 Meta75±1api $2.00/M2026-07

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▃▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #505 of 524 · 18% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Molmo 7B-D (0924), DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, Tulu 2 7B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Falcon3 1B Instruct, Granite 3.0 1B-A400M Instruct, StarCoderBase 3B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
HumanEval +113.4% ✎▄··▄····▄▄█▄ beats 6/6easy · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%sharp · several runs
MBPP lab22.0% ✎▁▃▁▄▅█▄▅▃▁▂▁ beats 2/81medium · avg 63%▇ 3.7%typical
chat & writing▃▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #462 of 463 · 24% of its score · 3 tests

Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, FastChat-T5 3B, SmolLM2 360M Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024)853.0 ✎▃▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 1/95avg 1201▇▇▇ 8.3%blunt
LMArena (text)975.0 ✎▃▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 1/379avg 1268▇▇▇ 8.2%blunt
MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs)2.6100 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎▆▂▂▆▆▄██▂▄▄▆ beats 0/28avg 8.819 MT-Bench score (1-10)▇▇▇ 7.2%sharp · noisy
math▁▃▃▅▇▅▅█▄▁▁▁ #454 of 462 * · 8.4% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Llama 2 13B Chat, DeepSeek-Coder 1.3B Base, StarCoderBase 7B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen2 0.5B Instruct, Granite 3.0 1B-A400M Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GSM8K lab17.8% ✎▂▂▃▅▅▆▅▇█▇▄▃ beats 11/146easy · avg 76%▇▇ 4.6%sharp
MATH lab3.9% ✎▃▅▂▆▅▃▅▃█▃▃▂ beats 3/29hard · avg 27%▇▇ 3.8%too hard for it
other tests12 not in a task · 50% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BIG-Bench Hard37.1% ✎███··█·█·█·█ beats 4/6easy · avg 76%▇▇▇ 8.3%sharp
MMLU +146.2% ✎▄▄·▄···▄▄·██ beats 6/8easy · avg 77%▇▇▇ 6.7%several runs
BoolQ lab78.1% ✎▁▄▅▆▂▆▄▄█▃▄▄ beats 36/58very easy · avg 93%▇▇ 4.8%at its level
ARC Challenge lab52.7% ✎▆▁▁▂▂▅▇█▄▃▃▂ beats 61/97easy · avg 86%▇▇ 4.5%sharp
Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (zero-shot)21.3% ✎▅····▃▅·██·█ beats 6/13medium · avg 59%▇▇ 4.3%typical
WinoGrande lab73.0% ✎▁···▂▁▁▅█▇▃▁ beats 71/87easy · avg 90%▇▇ 4.2%at its level
HellaSwag lab79.2% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▇█▆▅▃ beats 64/85very easy · avg 92%▇▇ 4.0%at its level
Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (10-shot)41.2% ✎▃▅▃··▅▃·█▃▃▅ beats 8/13easy · avg 67%▇▇ 3.8%at its level
4 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
OpenBookQA lab56.4% ✎█▁▁▁▄▃▃▇▃▁▄▂ beats 51/65easy · avg 80%▇ 3.1%typical
ARC Easy lab74.8% ✎▁▂▃▂▃▅▇█▇▆▄▆ beats 51/65very easy · avg 90%▇ 2.7%at its level
Social IQA lab50.4% ✎▂·▂██▅▅▁▂▃▆▁ beats 33/51medium · avg 65%▇ 1.6%blunt
PIQA lab80.1% ✎▁▁▁▃▃▄▇█▄▃▁▁ beats 68/83easy · avg 88%▇ 1.5%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LLaMA: Open and Efficient Fou… 47%, InstructEval (DeCLaRe Lab) RE… 21%, Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 8% and 3 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json