whatmodel.sh / KAT-Coder-Pro V1

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 is a closed-weights language model from Kuaishou (Kwaipilot), released October 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Arena entry 'KAT-Coder-Pro-V1' (webdev). Released 2025-10: @KwaiAICoder post 2025-10-23 announcing the official release of KAT-Coder-Pro V1. Proprietary agentic-coding model served on StreamLake (models overview updated 2026-09-24 lists KAT-Coder-Pro V1). It had an in-place update 'KAT-Coder-Pro V1 (1110)' on 2025-11-10, before the Arena first listed it (2025-12-01). The Arena organisation field is blank.

62.1±2.5#190 of 949 LLMsfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of KAT-Coder-Pro V1, out of 1132 with a score, then more from Kuaishou (Kwaipilot).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
245Devstral 2 (2512) Mistral62±2local~75GB2025-12
246Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (05-20) Google62±1comparison only2025-05
247KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Kuaishou (Kwaipilot)62±3api price unknown2025-10
248A.X K1 (519B-A33B) SK Telecom62±1local~1091GB2025-12
249watt-tool-8B Watt AI62±7local~6.1GB2024-12
more from Kuaishou (Kwaipilot)
99KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev (35B-A3B) Kuaishou (Kwaipilot)70±2local~22GB2026-07

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #158 of 469 * · 97% of its score · 1 test

Beats Gemini 2.5 Pro, Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B), Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512, Phi-4-reasoning 14B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1255.3 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 14/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%sharp

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · StreamLake · price unknown · 256k context · www.streamlake.ai ↗

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 97%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 3%
weighted average= 62.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json